I've got Let It Bleed on one of those DSD remastered CDs. From reading the notes on the remastering in the booklet, it sounds like they transferred the tapes to digital as DSD and they feel that this resulted in a better A/D conversion. Or, if you are cynical, they want you to believe it resulted in a better conversion. They then converted the DSD to 16/44.1 for the DSD CDs. When I put it in my SACD player the CD light comes on, not the SACD light.
A good taste of DSD--what is your experience?
Over the last year or so I've pushed to get my digital front end to sound better. I loosely define better to mean just that and "a touch more analog sounding."
My tube DAC is DSD 256 ready. I had to use third party software to stream DSD to the DAC from my Mac Air. I bought 6 DSD albums from Acoustic Sounds.
While I generally think Redbook sounds great on this DAC and 96kHz files don't sound that much better and Redbook. With DSD, the margin is greater for the better. Everything still depends on how good the original recording is though.
Some older recordings I tried, such as John Lee Hooker and Elvis, sound superb in DSD. And through a 300B amp the vocals are scary real in the listening space. The downside to me is cost of the albums, limited DSD library available, and the age-old problem for me of not having an album to hold and read. I'm not fond of doing the ritual exclusively on a laptop.
I'm curious as to the experiences of others. If you have embraced this format, how do you run it and what changes to your system or listening habits have you made ,if any, to accommodate it?
My tube DAC is DSD 256 ready. I had to use third party software to stream DSD to the DAC from my Mac Air. I bought 6 DSD albums from Acoustic Sounds.
While I generally think Redbook sounds great on this DAC and 96kHz files don't sound that much better and Redbook. With DSD, the margin is greater for the better. Everything still depends on how good the original recording is though.
Some older recordings I tried, such as John Lee Hooker and Elvis, sound superb in DSD. And through a 300B amp the vocals are scary real in the listening space. The downside to me is cost of the albums, limited DSD library available, and the age-old problem for me of not having an album to hold and read. I'm not fond of doing the ritual exclusively on a laptop.
I'm curious as to the experiences of others. If you have embraced this format, how do you run it and what changes to your system or listening habits have you made ,if any, to accommodate it?
- ...
- 29 posts total
I’ve not streamed DSD yet, but I have a number of SACDs. To my ears the SACD DSD disc in comparison to the same redbook recording sounds better and clearly higher resolution. The sound is more present/ real sounding, less compressed, bigger, more effortless / less strained and natural... yeah so more like a proper vinyl system ; ) |
To the OP, I’d say if you like DSD and classical music there are a lot of SACDs or downloads available, dive right in. If you’re looking for pop, rock, jazz, etc. it’s a tougher recommendation. Japan still releases a lot of nonclassical SACDs, but the prices are high and they don’t press that many so when they go out-of-print the prices go higher still. Many of the most popular albums have been done and are OOP. DSD downloads is anther option. Many people think Roon is the greatest thing going. It gathers information about your album from all over the web and has other functions as well. The downsides are that I have read complaints about DSD downloads being compressed and they may also disappear in the streaming onslaught. So, as I said, it’s a tough recommendation. |
This just in, from the lukpak.org discussion of the 2002 ABKCO DSD remasters, QZ1) Are the new Stones discs a big and NOTICABLE improvement over the old ABKCO discs in sound quality? AZ1) In general, yes, to a fairly large degree. My comments: However, the Virgin Stones releases circa 1994 are better than the original ABKCO remasters, too. So, that’s not saying much. I don’t think any of the ABKCO DSD remasters are the same albums as the Virgin remasters. Any of the above are very good sounding in my humble opinion. full discussion at, http://www.lukpac.org/stereostones/stones-cd-faq.txt |
for instance, "Can’t you hear me Knockin" the opening guitar riff sounds identical and I think anybody would only be guessing to identify which is DSD. When Mick and the band comes in is when I notice the bigger soundstage and the smoothness of the vocals...this is Jimmy Miller’s work and very hard to improve upon his mixing and the money they spent on the first go-round... bass is bit more pronounced and tonally superior |
- 29 posts total