A major disconnect between the audiophile magazine


Greetings from London. There is in my view a major disconnect between the audiophile magazines and their readers. It’s an understandable one but in my view an important one – and that the focus of this thread-starter.

Although I’m a UK-based high-end retailer I am, curiously despite 34 years on and off still interested in music first and foremost and then the equipment that reproduces it. With my end-user hat on I have to say that in a lot of my vintage gear is certainly, performance-wise, up to the standard of a lot of modern equipment. It’s not all plain sailing of course and there is the tricky issue of value versus price. Let me explain.

Take the ARC SP-8 for example. Venerable, rightly revered and a bargain on the used market. Yes of course my ARC SP-10 and 11 are more musically credible. But in too many instances this is the exception rather than the rule. I’ve recently purchased a British Fidelity {Musical Fidelity outside the UK) P270 heavy-grunt power amp for $560 USD. 23 years old. Is the latest MF power amp of a similar specification noticeably AND significantly superior? Somehow, I doubt it. Different, certainly. But more musically credible? Hmm, somehow I doubt it. But I could be wrong. Very wrong in fact. So other than through substantial investment with the probability of selling one of the two units at some financial loss, how am I to know?

Now where do the magazines come into all this you might ask? Well let’s assume (naïve though it might be) that their primary reason for existence is to serve to needs of the reader. If so, then surely a side-by-side comparison of the two Musical Fidelity power amps (used purely for illustrative purposes in this post) is as valid as the mooted ARC SP8 versus SP10 comparison.

Clearly no advertiser of new equipment in an audiophile magazine would countenance this if they knew that the much touted new model really at best only sounded different to its vintage same-brand rival rather than better. Well, that goes with territory. The mags need to make a profit and to pay the staff at least a reasonable wage. But the point remains that given (a) the over-supply of new high-end gear in a diminishing market and (b) the buyers markets for high-value vintage gear that may indeed – or possibly not – sonically rival performance of new gear and (c) the justified end-user cynicism regarding the hype and hyperbole of marketing phrases re new gear, then end-users are at a significant disadvantage when seeking value rather than lowest pricing.

The paradox is that the very people most suited to addressing this are constrained by economic reality.

So, what’s to be done? Well, I’m thinking of doing a few comparative subjective reviews myself on my blog. Possibly for my own amusement and possibly to the altruistic benefit of others. My question though is – is there a demand? Perhaps those of you with an interest (rather than an axe to grind) might want to contact me via Audiogon, or perhaps continue the thread?

Meanwhile, my Musical Fidelity P270 sounds terrific into my Vandersteen 2c Signatures. As a start, I’m going to compare the P270 to something much newer of a similar spec and, as best I can judge, of a comparative price once 23 years of inflation are factored in.

I’m using a Carver 400t preamp, various SAE preamps, a Meridian 101b, a recent Arcam pre and North Star 2-box CD player. This leads me conveniently to the conclusion that modern DACs truly are an improvement t (generally speaking) over vintage ones. I say this having owned the $20k USD STAX X1-t. This isn’t the case with speakers though and having come to my senses about the Linn LP12 and accepted my frustration re the sonically magnificent but challenging Funk products. Re vintage speakers that to me easily equally or indeed surpass the performance of rivals from competitors I’d put the Magneplanar 20.R right up there with the finest. Similarly with the Infinity IRS and the Spendor BC3s. These BC3s although not quite as good as the Harbeth 40.1s can be had for a tiny fraction of the latter’s price. Dahlquist DQ10s being another case in point. And so it goes. Is the magnificent vintage Rowland power amps truly an altogether lesser beast than their new units? Incidentally am I the only one over her that feels (no, not feels … actually knows) that Rowland really is one of this industry's marginalised brands?

I now use a big old Denon Direct drive in a custom plinth comprising notinventedherium interspersed with layers of female yak-dung as a vibration absorber. The improvement using the female free-range version (1958 vintage) compared to the battery-farmed YD of recent years is nothing short of astonishing.

Finally, as I write this I’m listening to true vintage. Pink Floyd “Echoes” off the very rare “Rhapsody In Pink” live set through a mono speaker. If like me you saw the Floyd performing this live, the absence of Pace, Rhythm & Timing is an irrelevance. The musical trigger to the memory is sufficient. Anyway, those of you who wish to – you know how to find me.

Thank you

Regards

Howard Popeck / Stereonow Ltd
128x128bigaitch
Want something to compare? Stereophile archives of tests are online. Sometimes, but not often there is a 'revisit'. They did so with my CD player, an original FD1000 sold here as a Magnevox. Kind of fun reading impressions and listening tests from 25+ years ago.

Stereo mags / equipment manufacturers VS end users is the same as
Car mags / Builders VS drivers.

How many autos OR hifi components are given terrific reviews than......vanish?

Cars seem to have improved, but costs are wacky. How many people are equipped to properly drive half a million $ worth of Ferrari? And afford the upkeep.
Nope, I'll stay in the relatively shallow end of the pool and stay away from brand-new/ latest greatest.
Excellent version of "Echoes," BTW... though it's hard to find a bad one. (Also, check out "Any Colour You Like" from the Boston 1975 ROIO-- you'll just feel like you're stoned.
I have one example in my experience. I had the Pass Labs Aleph 2 monos - 100 watts, Class A. I thought they were very good, but the Pass XA100.5 monos- 100 watts, Class A - in the same system, sounded MUCH better.

The magazines present snapshot recommendations of what is currently available. As long as one understands that that is what they offer, they can be enjoyed. Sites like this one and the internet in general have made it possible to locate and research some great older designs. I think audiophiles are trading equipment now as a result of this, much more than before. And the market offers so many more possibilities than before. The main magazines have not really adapted to this new reality and IMO are becoming less relevant and have less influence on purchase decisions. Though, I did read about the XA100.5 in TAS and that review was very accurate.
I do use a re-capped, upgraded Sansui AU D-11 and upgraded LT-30 as the center of my vinyl rig. Given the value of this thread, my questions begin with:
Let's assume vintage compares favorably to current equipment. Will the comparisons simply place a significantly higher cost on vintage equipment? What of brick & mortar stores? Will they need to scour the garage & estate sales to keep a stock of vintage equipment to remain open and competitive?

I firmly believe in the performance of vintage equipment, but also believe comparisons on blogs, in magazines or online will ultimately result in a price shift upward to collector-level stupidity.
Hello Mt10425

Given the value of this thread, my questions begin with:

“Let's assume vintage compares favorably to current equipment. Will the comparisons simply place a significantly higher cost on vintage equipment?”

Yes, probably. None of us individually can buck market forces. One point of view, and it is one that I subscribe too is that in terms of pricing, decent vintage gear in working condition is more often than not woefully underpriced. Or in comparison, new is woefully overpriced. Or more simply, he price differential between new and used gear of similar performance is far too high.

“What of brick & mortar stores? Will they need to scour the garage & estate sales to keep a stock of vintage equipment to remain open and competitive?”

Over here in the UK it’s already happening. Both Hi-fi World and Hi-Fi News carry more display ads from specialised used audiophile retailers than they do for those frantically trying to promote over-priced and hyped-up new releases. Market forces are not swayed by nostalgia.

“I firmly believe in the performance of vintage equipment, but also believe comparisons on blogs, in magazines or online will ultimately result in a price shift upward to collector-level stupidity. “

Possibly, if I were to agree with you that all collectors are inherently stupid. In my experience some are and the majority are not.