Accurate non-boomy sub for satellite system


Looking for recommendations for an accurate, non-booming sub for use in a medium sized room with very small satellites. I tend to believe that a sealed enclosure design is preferable. DIY is not out of the question either (as a I have a solid plate amplifier on hand...but would need driver and cabinet recommendations. Thanks.
silas
If you DIY, try to design for a fairly low, near 'critically damped' 'Q' of about .71
Above abot 1.0, a speaker will start to have problems with peaky bass/ poor control while too low....bass gets 'thin'.
One problem with most vented subs is that they are approximately "flat" under anechoic conditions, often down to a very low frequency. So when room gain is factored in (typically +3 dB per octave below 100 Hz), the result is a slow and bass-heavy presentation. Yuck.

A sealed box typically avoids the problem of excess deep bass energy, which is definitely an improvement. Its rolloff slope is closer to the inverse of room gain. That being said, I think it's possible to do even better.

"Even better" is a low-tuned vented sytem designed such that its anechoic response rolls off at about 3 dB per octave from about 100 Hz down to the tuning frequency, below which it of course rolls off rapidly. Even this doesn't solve all the problems - there's still the inevitable peaks and dips imposed by room interaction, and these can ruin an otherwise good sub's presentation. Rather than equalization, I suggest using multiple small subs distributed asymmetrically around the room, so that the sum of their individual peak-and-dip patterns is smoother than any one of them would have been.

In other words, work with the room instead of fighting it - sort of an acoustic application of the "sometimes it's easier to plow around the stumps" concept.

Duke
dealer/manufacturer
Duke,

I recently added two small subs (Velodyne SPLR 8") and extensive experimentation with room placement allowed me to reduce 15db peaks to 11db - 12db peaks (AFTER utilizing the onboard auto eq function on the SPLR subs). An outboard PEQ (Velodyne SMS-1) allowed fine tuning and I managed app +/- 3db from 25hz to 200hz. Inserting the SMS-1 between my Verity Parsifal monitors and actively crossing to and biamping the Encore woofers took me to +/- 3 or 4db between 38ish hz and 200hz from a very bad starting place. The crossover point and slopes I'm using are limited by the high pass in the SMS-1 and I suspect that a more flexible outboard cross would allow further improvements. (The trade off here was giving up about a half octave of pretty raggedy response in the deepest bass before EQ.)

I know that the approach is conceptually unappealling to many purists (I was somewhere on the upper portion of that list until recently), but the results are hard to argue with. This is audible improvement unlike any change to my system that I can recall over the last decade. I would never have tried but for a crappy new room. Now, I doubt I'll go back to unequalized bass.

BTW, the SMS is fairly cheap (app $600 at Audioadvisor.com) and -if you haven't already -you might want to play with one to see how it affects your opinion of EQ'd bass. Given your extensive experience designing speakers, I'd love to hear your reaction.

Just my experience.

Marty