I have owned the 565 and used it with satisfactory results. The line stage in the bypass mode is by far the better options. The line stage is good, but what made this a great value was the phono stage. However, this appears to be a non-issue with you. I found it to work well with A.Q. cables. As stated above, it should be a fine match with your 250. I not familar with the all of the variables you have presented and it may be difficult to find someone who has heard this combination as a total system, but in the $ range you are discussing this pre-amp shines above many others. I would highly recommend it unless you are willing to pay more.
Adcom 565 pre-amp fit here?
I would very much appreciate opinions on utilizing an Adcom 565 pre-amp in the following system:
NAD 512 (CD source)
Sony 360 (DVD source - just stereo)
Acurus A250 (amp)
B&W DM100 (speakers - been using them since the 80's)
Audioquest Type4 (speaker wire)
Audioquest Ruby (interconnect)
The system is apartment based - primarily music, with stereo movie viewing.
Really anxious to replace a Carver C-1 pre-amp!
I've always felt the speakers were pretty clean, the Acurus just a tad forward in the highs, and the NAD a bit warm and mellow... Thoughts?
Thank you
NAD 512 (CD source)
Sony 360 (DVD source - just stereo)
Acurus A250 (amp)
B&W DM100 (speakers - been using them since the 80's)
Audioquest Type4 (speaker wire)
Audioquest Ruby (interconnect)
The system is apartment based - primarily music, with stereo movie viewing.
Really anxious to replace a Carver C-1 pre-amp!
I've always felt the speakers were pretty clean, the Acurus just a tad forward in the highs, and the NAD a bit warm and mellow... Thoughts?
Thank you
- ...
- 7 posts total
- 7 posts total