I will wax philosophic here and offer that cables do make a difference (as does everything in a stereo system), but not nearly as much as many people claim. I have no data to back that up, but do keep in mind the evaluators, humans, are the same species who produce wine tasters who line up to a row of identical glasses of wine and swear by their heirarchical ratings of their quality.
While better cables are improving some people's systems for sure, there are hosts of others claiming improvements who I'm sure are really noticing different speaker placement, room dynamics, or a phenomenon similar to the above-mentioned wine tasters.
How many stereophiles are willing to submit themselves to blind tests, whereby they are blindfolded and attempt to pick out whether a cable has been swapped out for a better one or merely left alone to trick him?
All that being said, I ponied up for about $200 in Kimber 4TC to biwire my new speakers to my 70 Watt Denon receiver. I can't be positive of the sound difference that I think is there over the previously existing monster cable, but I sure like knowing that 4TC is back there. :)
While better cables are improving some people's systems for sure, there are hosts of others claiming improvements who I'm sure are really noticing different speaker placement, room dynamics, or a phenomenon similar to the above-mentioned wine tasters.
How many stereophiles are willing to submit themselves to blind tests, whereby they are blindfolded and attempt to pick out whether a cable has been swapped out for a better one or merely left alone to trick him?
All that being said, I ponied up for about $200 in Kimber 4TC to biwire my new speakers to my 70 Watt Denon receiver. I can't be positive of the sound difference that I think is there over the previously existing monster cable, but I sure like knowing that 4TC is back there. :)