Audio Magic Clairvoyant Liquid Air AC cable

I have done some A/B with the CT vs. AM IC. The AM LA seems disjointed and has a muddy film over the recording compared to the CT cable. Both have the same spooky quiet background that only the JPS Aluminata previous brought to the table in my system.

Back in '05 when CT came out with this non metal cable the rap against it was that of a lackluster top end extension. That has been dealt with with the new Nano cable.

I do believe both AM/CT has what I think is cutting edge new technoloy that must be heard. If you want more of a romantic tube like sound then
the AM is for you. If you want a more revealing cable that digs out all that
is on the recording In an organic manner than the CT is for you.

The AM LA seems disjointed and has a muddy film over the recording compared to the CT cable.

wow! i am surprised to read the word "disjointed" & "muddy film" in your feedback. I didn't think that they had either of these attributes......

Thanks for the feedback, Glory. From CT's website it looks like the power cable & the speaker cable are not liquid; rather metal based. Only the interconnects are liquid based (microfibers immersed in liquid ceramic).
So, which set of cables do you think that you'll end up keeping?

I have a Clairvoyant Liquid Air AC cord running from my Bybee Power Purifier 'Stealth' power conditioner to my Modwright-Sony 5400ES SACD player (modified Sony transport - not the seprerate power supply). It has proven to be the best AC cord I have found in this particular use, besting Lessloss Signature, Tara Labs "The One", Kubala Sosna Emotion, and ASI Liveline cords. The Modwight-Sony 5400ES is a superb unit that has virtually no electronic signature with any of these cords. However with the the Liquid Air cord CD's and SACD's sound like high end vinyl. If I had to use one word to describe the sound of the Clairvoyant Liquid Air AC cord in this application it would be "analogue". However I preferred the Kubala Sosna cord on my modified Pathos TT RR amp. But I intend to listen to the Liquid Air cord on the Pathos again. The Liquid Air cord sounds different from all of these metal cords, and on the Pathos amp I had the sense that something was missing, particularly in the bass. However I am not sure that it weasn't a case of my ears not being used to a complete lack of metal and the electronic signature that metal cables have. Note that the Liquid Air cord was as fast as the ASI Liveline.

I had the full Cerious loom a couple of years ago, when Six Moons first reviewed them. They were very musical but a little slow, and they rounded off transients and softened dynamics a little. They were also stiff and difficult to route. I can only compare based on memory, but as I recall the Cerious sound, the AM Clairvoyant Liquid Air is clearly superior to the Cerious AC cord, in every parameter.

Glory, have you given the AM's enough time? I am very interested in a report back of your findings to date. IC PC and SC