ozzy,
Ok, you still won't explain how my equipment helps explain why I have the view you think I have.
This happens literally every time I get the demand "list your system!" If I report being skeptical of cable differences the response from at least some is always "either your hearing isn't good enough or your system isn't good enough to hear the differences other people OBVIOUSLY hear."
And when I list my system it always goes to radio silence....because I've owned plenty of great gear. In fact I recently had my friend over, an audio reviewer, to listen to my Joseph speakers which recently arrived from being upgraded to the "graphene 2" version. I've dialed them in very nicely - the detail, transparency, soundstaging, imaging...is just wild. My reviewer pal was totally blown away, like in shock, shaking his head saying "how did you DO this?" To put that in context, he has been reviewing since the late 90's or so, currently he's got in $65,000 Estelon speakers for review, hooked up to tens of thousands of dollars worth of Nordost and other high end cabling, conditioning etc. Yet my system....using "mere" belden speaker cabling and mostly cheap interconnects blew him away. Which didn't surprise me because I get to hear extremely expensive systems all the time, and I know how mine competes.
So any implication that my system isn't worthy of hearing sonic differences betweeen cables is barking up the wrong tree. (And audiophiles with far less capable systems claim to hear cable differences, so it can't just be a You Need An Incredible Most People Can't Afford system to hear cable differences).
So I presume the fact you know my equipment is good stuff is why you've avoided directly answering my question. Until you answer my question, it's fair to presume that my equipment list does not, in fact, help justify your (mis) understanding of my position at all.
You have tried this or that and you conclude they don't matter. Sort of like the Audio Science guy. Measurements are everything.
I have been significantly more nuanced in my conclusions. That's why I bothered explaining them in the first place. You can either engage with what I write...or ignore it but then we are just left with strawmen, which never helps any conversation.