AVM 20 or AVM 30 vs Mid-Fi Yamaha Receiver


I am currently running the pre/pro portion of my Yamaha RX-V659 Receiver with a Sunfire Cinema Grand II amp (5 x 225W) with 3 Von Schweikert LCR-15s across the front and VS T-150s as the rears. I am debating upgrading to an AVM 20 or 30 and wanted opinions as to whether or not it would be worth it based on the other equipment I currently have in the system.
post2338
The Anthem AVM 30 is as good as it gets in my opinion, add a panasonic bd-55 blu ray player with built in hd decoding(or other like blu ray players)for under $300 and you are up to date and have everything there is to offer, including stellar 2 channel music. Anyone who doesnt think the Anthem is a top knotch performer is looking at price tags and not using there ears.
If you dont have money coming out of your ears, buy the Onkyo 906 and enjoy 95% or more of the 2 channel performance of the anthem avm30/mca combo. Not to mention all the latest HD formats. Include the fact you dont need XLR/RCA Cables, and it takes up less room, and you got yourself a $1200 receiver worth perhaps much more in value then the $2000 anthem combo in my opinion.(used prices)
I agree with Sthomas12321 100%. I have an Anthem AVM30, Rotel 1075 and Panny bd-55 combo. It's great for HT. We are changing the room around a bit and I will need to go the AVR route to take up less space. I love the Anthem sound and will miss it. Fortunately I have a separate 2 channel tube system. You can pick up the AVM 30 for under $900 on A'gon now which is a steal IMHO. PM me if your interested in a black one.

MB