The intercchange went like this --
You wrote ---
"I suffer when I listen to my music in two channel."
"That's because you're listening with low end home theater gear."
>>it's as good as your system<<
You've upgraded since then, but going by your listed system, you are welcome to think a system that cost a fraction of mine is just as good, but obviously I don't share that opinion.
Price range aside, since I do not suffer when I listen to music in two channel, I think your own indictment of your system is enough to refute your argument.
>>Got any insite how this approach is flawed<<
I'm not sure how you achieve what you suggest on Saffy's budget.
You're short on budgetary details.
You wrote ---
"I suffer when I listen to my music in two channel."
"That's because you're listening with low end home theater gear."
>>it's as good as your system<<
You've upgraded since then, but going by your listed system, you are welcome to think a system that cost a fraction of mine is just as good, but obviously I don't share that opinion.
Price range aside, since I do not suffer when I listen to music in two channel, I think your own indictment of your system is enough to refute your argument.
>>Got any insite how this approach is flawed<<
I'm not sure how you achieve what you suggest on Saffy's budget.
You're short on budgetary details.