Cable Costs Relative to System


Since making a spread sheet with my audio system prices, I have been thinking(shocked) about my total investment in cables. My total system retails at $67,000 (Digital and analog front ends included). I purchased all of it here on Audiogon so my investment is about 50%. Of that I have about 10% invested in interconnects and cables and another 10% in Power Cables (Shunyata Hydra included). That's $13,000 worth of wire. I'm starting to question whether it might be more effective to put some of this budget into acitve components. It would take forever to listen to all possible combinations, but would like to hear others experiences with relatively high end systems and cable selection. It would seem to me that the point of diminishing returns would be reached sooner with cables than with speakers and amps. Do most of you follow the 10% "rule" for cabling? How do PCs fit into this rule? Are there any super bargain cables capable of keeping up with highly resolving electronics?
metaphysics
I've got an interesting thing for you to think about, what cable connection between components makes the most sense to put the best grade cable in including the speaker cable? If you follow the signal path from the cd player the one from there to the preamp is the weakest and most delicate, it needs to be boosted in a refined way so as to be a more robust level for the amp. If the cable loses minute detail because it isn't as good that detail will be gone from the system. Preserve that signal in the highest form possible to the preamp and you can drop to a lower grade cable from the preamp to amp and the detail that was fragile has been boosted so it passes through lesser cable without detail disappearing. I've used a trick of putting best in the first spot and medium grade in the next. It makes a huge difference from the other way where you have lost important ambient information, it doesn't have the dynamic energy.
In a budget allocation scenario the lower the budget the higher ratio I'll spend on cable, cheaper electronics fed with a better signal does better than if you dropped the cable cost back to nothing and put that money into a better component. The better component with cheap wire won't sound as good as the cheaper one that had more detail and depth.
Anyone who would pay $13,000 for wire just to connect his or hers stereo, should be strangled with it.
I spent $3,750 on cable for my system so maybe I should only be whipped with it! ;-)
"09-16-06: Sksos
I'll throw-in my 2 cents worth (maybe it's already been said, I didn't read all 135 responses up to this point!). Power cords can make or break a system IMHO."

I've asked before and will again; how can changing the last few feet of power cable in a chain of many miles from the power company, via various substations, power lines and your house wiring, possibly change how your system sounds?
Uninteruptable power supplies and conditioners I can understand. But suggesting that 3 feet of "special" power cord can improve an audio setup seems absurd. It's like saying that if your water supply comes via 10 miles of dirty pipes, then replacing the last 3 feet with new pure copper piping will suddenly make the water pure again.
If anyone can give an explanation better than "I've tried several and I can hear the difference", then I'm happy to stand corrected.
Carl109...

If you consider a line cord as a type of circuit rather than wire, there lies the answer. What runs from the Utility Co. to a residence and then the house wiring is hardly a tuned or optimized circuit.

Kind Regards,
Robert
RSAD