The Duelund WPIO inductor is here.
As with all Duelund products it has a smell that makes you feel you could eat it.
It has a similiar look as the vintage inductor (meaning wax paper type) except again clearly better made. The vintage wires (and is not a foil) are not held so tight. Clearly Duelund looks like a quality product. Duelund is just one hard chunk. Looks different than the pics too guys? The whole inductor is sealed like CAST?
The first 15 minutes are VERY good. Again Duelund sounds excellent right out of the box. Duelund has been the only product that is better than vintage in EVERY way and once again EVERYTIME.
The North Creek inductor was better in some ways but not in others. (ringing)
I took a big risk (for me) on this inductor. I knew the caps were worn out an inductor of course does not wear so the change from Duelund from vinage would have to be all in quality of part.
The sound is much more open than the vintage that while it does not ring is somewhat dead and muffled. How Duelund does this I do not know? The sound is alive.
Duelund keep stunning balance.
I have more Jensen Copper paper tube caps here and will do one signal in them. So far they are pretty good but even the Jensens which are better than the vintage in the phono stage but the vintage does sound more alive? Jensen nice from top to bottom but so far not liquid alive sound like Duelund parts?
I will see if that is a Jensen trait?
Maybe I am gettin too picky? Like Jimmy says once you hear Duelund nothing else seems to cut it.
Right now the test is with no Jensen caps in the signal just off the CD.
One Duelund trait not many mention is they make your best and worst CD sound better. To me this is very important as who cares if just your best sounds better.
I will get to do a full comparison in the next few days after the inductor is broke in. I will do a Duelund/North Creek as well.
As with all Duelund products it has a smell that makes you feel you could eat it.
It has a similiar look as the vintage inductor (meaning wax paper type) except again clearly better made. The vintage wires (and is not a foil) are not held so tight. Clearly Duelund looks like a quality product. Duelund is just one hard chunk. Looks different than the pics too guys? The whole inductor is sealed like CAST?
The first 15 minutes are VERY good. Again Duelund sounds excellent right out of the box. Duelund has been the only product that is better than vintage in EVERY way and once again EVERYTIME.
The North Creek inductor was better in some ways but not in others. (ringing)
I took a big risk (for me) on this inductor. I knew the caps were worn out an inductor of course does not wear so the change from Duelund from vinage would have to be all in quality of part.
The sound is much more open than the vintage that while it does not ring is somewhat dead and muffled. How Duelund does this I do not know? The sound is alive.
Duelund keep stunning balance.
I have more Jensen Copper paper tube caps here and will do one signal in them. So far they are pretty good but even the Jensens which are better than the vintage in the phono stage but the vintage does sound more alive? Jensen nice from top to bottom but so far not liquid alive sound like Duelund parts?
I will see if that is a Jensen trait?
Maybe I am gettin too picky? Like Jimmy says once you hear Duelund nothing else seems to cut it.
Right now the test is with no Jensen caps in the signal just off the CD.
One Duelund trait not many mention is they make your best and worst CD sound better. To me this is very important as who cares if just your best sounds better.
I will get to do a full comparison in the next few days after the inductor is broke in. I will do a Duelund/North Creek as well.