After evaluating things, I decided on getting a low 2 shelf 18” high cabinet that is wide compared to putting a normal rack on the side. Since I wanted both right and left reflection point absorbers to be identical, I would have had to put the rack in a null position which would have required very long speaker cables or put the amp between the speakers and buy very long balanced cables. The cables I buy aren’t cheap. I have had this rack between the speakers in multiple dedicated rooms now without any SQ degradation
- ...
- 30 posts total
Glitz Queens !Yep, the ones that stare endlessly at their shiny new chassis and blue led’s while "pretending to listen to music". Usually ones that buy their equipment on looks and high cost more than how it sounds. The cables I buy aren’t cheapBut "glitz queens spend even more on their shiny racks to stare at. Put it all to the side spend a bit more on cable and get far better depth and imagining than you ever had. Cheers George |
https://systems.audiogon.com/systems/7605 I am planning on adding some bigger speakers to the room shown in the above URL. I have a 1 foot deep and 72" long oak bookshelf, which is visible in one of the photos of the interior of my closet. I was wondering if the bookshelf were moved to in-between the speakers would I get some sonic benefit, such as less reflection of sound waves from the absorption of the books? If I do that I can then put a low audio rack in the closet. I know I can try this myself by moving the furniture but it would take me a long time to take down my desk and then move everything around. So I guess I am asking for a theoretical opinion on such an arrangement. |
- 30 posts total