Fiddler,
1) Given the large number of legal precedents, why is this not common knowlege?
2) Why is it that enforcement of this law (or statute, or rule, or regulation or order, or whatever it's called) is seemingly done on a complaint-driven basis?
3) Why are some of the compliance orders issued by the FTC given a five year time limit?
4) In the Chrysler case:
-----a) Was the dealer association the target of a complaint by Chrysler because of the threatened boycott, or were the dealers the plaintiffs?
-----b) What were the terms of that settlement?
-----c) Did Chrysler have to change its vehicle allocation restrictions or not?
1) Given the large number of legal precedents, why is this not common knowlege?
2) Why is it that enforcement of this law (or statute, or rule, or regulation or order, or whatever it's called) is seemingly done on a complaint-driven basis?
3) Why are some of the compliance orders issued by the FTC given a five year time limit?
4) In the Chrysler case:
-----a) Was the dealer association the target of a complaint by Chrysler because of the threatened boycott, or were the dealers the plaintiffs?
-----b) What were the terms of that settlement?
-----c) Did Chrysler have to change its vehicle allocation restrictions or not?