Dave,
1) Qutest runs on wall wart
. No power cables
2) It appears there is minor breakin...
It still sounds very forward and extremely detailed, but
When running Tidal as only app , the Qutest is running native 44/16
It is very forward and incisively detailed, very good bass & superb soundstage
It makes the really well recorded stuff sound superlative
It makes the 80's rock that is compressed sound "ouch incisively bright" and forward
The orange or red filter takes a bit of transient edge off and still sounds natural
It makes the great recordings much better, but the poor recording much worse.
I have had a recent revelation, as I purchased Roon and all its up sampling , filters and DSP
When running DSD128 up sampling & Smooth-linear filter the Qutest is very, very smooth and more rounded like SACD with all the details
The difference between up sampled Pcm & DSD is super apparent
Pcm is way more incisive and detail oriented
where the DSD is smoother, detailed and not as forward and all the crappy stuff sounds really good
Sorry for the confusing description, but it appears to be a tale of 2 sound profiles when using up sampling
Anyway, I've listened to 4 Dac's in my system
Playback Designs Merlot DSD ( my top choice) Really nice bass & as close to analog as I've heard
Chord Qutest ( when running DSD,close to merlot)
Exogal Comet ( 2nd choice)
Meridian Explorer2. Warm and nice ,but short on details
If You are running a highly resolving speaker the Qutest might be to much , when running PCM.
I have a definite taste bias towards DSD .
I'm keeping it running DSD , but if I could run only pcm, I'd send it back
So, Take my opinion with grain of salt
Jeff
1) Qutest runs on wall wart
. No power cables
2) It appears there is minor breakin...
It still sounds very forward and extremely detailed, but
When running Tidal as only app , the Qutest is running native 44/16
It is very forward and incisively detailed, very good bass & superb soundstage
It makes the really well recorded stuff sound superlative
It makes the 80's rock that is compressed sound "ouch incisively bright" and forward
The orange or red filter takes a bit of transient edge off and still sounds natural
It makes the great recordings much better, but the poor recording much worse.
I have had a recent revelation, as I purchased Roon and all its up sampling , filters and DSP
When running DSD128 up sampling & Smooth-linear filter the Qutest is very, very smooth and more rounded like SACD with all the details
The difference between up sampled Pcm & DSD is super apparent
Pcm is way more incisive and detail oriented
where the DSD is smoother, detailed and not as forward and all the crappy stuff sounds really good
Sorry for the confusing description, but it appears to be a tale of 2 sound profiles when using up sampling
Anyway, I've listened to 4 Dac's in my system
Playback Designs Merlot DSD ( my top choice) Really nice bass & as close to analog as I've heard
Chord Qutest ( when running DSD,close to merlot)
Exogal Comet ( 2nd choice)
Meridian Explorer2. Warm and nice ,but short on details
If You are running a highly resolving speaker the Qutest might be to much , when running PCM.
I have a definite taste bias towards DSD .
I'm keeping it running DSD , but if I could run only pcm, I'd send it back
So, Take my opinion with grain of salt
Jeff