Hi Twl, I already understood your point about the mag's motivation. No blame, but it would be great if you understood my post.
"You are the one with the apparent "ulterior motives"."
"At least we make ourselves publically known on this forum as reps."
One could get more base and realize every action requires motivation, but the quality of the motives is what is really pertinent. There is major difference between Star Sound's and my circumstances in which we post, profit v. personal experiences. That is why you put the rep tag with your posts. If I was to use a disclaimer, everyone should ala slippery slope. I am not copping to an ulterior motive, but I realize none of you buy that. The problem, I think, is that my experience was bad. No one would care if with equal force, I posted good experiences. But yes, lets move on.
Regarding your second paragraph, I already read it in your past posts. I got it regarding the valve farce but not to be self-centered now maybe more will. Its just there's no longer that disagreement between you and Dickson. I appreciate the response; it was nice to see an attempt to sort of correlate that article, which I have used to draw my conclusion, with your position.
""Your stance, (A)" is a very interesting point. Perhaps it applies to you?"
Its not interesting. I get what youre saying - no.
"Considering that there are less than 5 Audiogon members..."
Good company.