dCS Bartok Apex vs any similar priced DAC


I’m about to upgrade my system from scratch, the speakers will be ATC SCM50ASL Classic active. I don’t have any records, digital rips only on my Innuos Zen MINI & LPSU. 

The dCS Bartok Apex direct into the active ATC is where I want to go. Any opinions about any better matched DAC / DAC streamer/preamp combo that’s better matched to the ATC ?

 

Thinking WEISS 501, Esoteric N-05 XD, Chord DAVE

 

seadog137

If you’re seeking a richly musical and thoroughly enjoyable experience, Aries Cerat offers exceptional options. With each model, you'll find significant enhancements in transparency and dynamics. However, if you prefer a more clinical and analytical presentation, DCS stands out as the ideal choice.

why do so many people on these types of threads simply "root" for whatever DAC brand they already own??....wow these guys really know their stuff, huh!!!

 

@jymc “why do so many people on these types of threads simply "root" for whatever DAC brand they already own?”

I suspect that pretty much regardless of your technique, experience level, financial means, or tastes, what you have is the culmination of your search and is the best to you. Which, of course, can mean a lot or nothing. So it makes sense you would have the best sounding DAC (given your circumstances) and would recommend it.

 

I bought my first DAC (a two box cd transport / DAC) around 1990. I used separate DACs for travel, my home system and my office system since that time. I have a good system and have had DACs of the $3.5K - $22K in my system. So, big surprise, I recommend my DAC provided you want a detailed natural sounding musical DAC. I will admit if you are a “detail trumps all” kind of guy or in a much lower price range I will recommend something else. But typically I try to comment when I believe I can add value.

dCS is horrendously overpriced and represents some of the worst value is audio equipment. There are many DACs that are built even better and sound as good or better than the dCS like the Bricasti Design M1.

The ATC speaker you are interested in retails for 24,500.00. It uses analog active crossovers between its amps forgoing the huge advantage doing this in the digital domain. There are things you can do in the digital realm such as subwoofer management, room control and EQ that are impossible to do in the analog realm without adding distortion. I also hate the idea of amps closed off in loudspeakers were they have no ventilation and get the crap vibrated out of them if there is a woofer in the box. I have seen connection work harden and break. I would get the passive version of the speaker and triamp it using a DEQX Pre 8 and you can add subwoofers seamlessly down the line if you care. You get a preamp, a digital processor, 8 channel DAC and high res streamer all in one Australian Box. Then you can get whatever amp you like best in each position. One more thing about DACs, they followed the same path op amps did. Over a period of 40 years the DAC chips now handily match or even improve on the function of discreet units. Using them allows the manufacturer to save serious money and be able to offer 8 channel DACs at a reasonable price. The Pre 8 is not cheap at $15,000, but if it had 4 discreet DACs (8 channels) it would cost $55,000. For people who like the idea of an active loudspeaker, and I am one of them, the Pre 8 is a game changer. 

After almost a years time the OP most certainly made a choice- @seadog137 what was your verdict?