Digital enhancement

Can anyone here write a coherent sentence? It really does impact how an argument will impact readers. 

I am admittedly very confused. I actually paid close attention to Bacch-SP for a short while but could not get a good sense out of whether the processor/dac is doing something different or better out of recordings that are already great in soundstage and image. For example, comparing (with good headphone is recommended) this demonstration (by the inventor/developer) with the original recordings done in 1992 what are your thoughts? I understood the quality of on-site recording might downgrade the quality of sound from the processor but if the original recording has been great in SS, image, separation etc. what do I need additional processor for. Does the processor take a so-so recording, analyze it and apply 3D effect to it? I wish someone that has actual experience with the processor could shed some light,

(music starts at 01:17)

(Original recording in 1992)

the biggest digital enhancement i've ever heard [aside from dsp room correction] was CEDAR. elimination of impulsive disturbances and broadband noise goes a long way towards enhancing intelligibility and enjoyment of phonograph-based music recordings. 

Have no clue what Kelavin is about … even after a Google search.  If you want to improve your digital sound you need to attack jitter first and then EM noise in your system.  It’s not as straight forward as adding a new more expensive DAC