@cleeds The attribution should be to the interpretation.
A component amplifies, It does not Do Detail (to use one example from this thread).
"It is amazing how much detail a Mac has"
The recording is the information. The system (NOT component) as a whole (and room) expresses it.
Listener A loves the sound and proclaims it perfect.
Listener B hates the sound ("too harsh" / "too clinical").
Listener C finds the system too polite and lacking "detail."
The recording, system (and component) and room did not change. The listeners' interpretations are what are different.
Also note: I never made any claims regarding "So you can’t claim that the result of any given combination is:" in my post that you responded to. That interpretation is yours. : )
A component amplifies, It does not Do Detail (to use one example from this thread).
"It is amazing how much detail a Mac has"
The recording is the information. The system (NOT component) as a whole (and room) expresses it.
Listener A loves the sound and proclaims it perfect.
Listener B hates the sound ("too harsh" / "too clinical").
Listener C finds the system too polite and lacking "detail."
The recording, system (and component) and room did not change. The listeners' interpretations are what are different.
Also note: I never made any claims regarding "So you can’t claim that the result of any given combination is:" in my post that you responded to. That interpretation is yours. : )