Dvorak Cello Concerto


  Some recordings imprint us with impressions of a piece that any other interpretation just doesn’t sound right, particularly if we have listened to that recording a bunch prior to hearing others.  In this work I had a recording by Maurice Gendron, a French Cellist known more as a teacher than a recording artist, and Haitink with the LPO, that I played the proverbial grooves off 40 years ago.

  The piece itself is one of Dvorak’s greatest.  He was a superb melodist..  Brahms once said that other Composers could make a career using the chips that flew off his workbench. However a lot of his works can sound formulaic, as he tries to make those gorgeous tunes fill up a structure they can’t support.  When he was inspired however, he soared, and this Concerto is one of his peaks.  Written after several years in America when he was pining to be home with his family, he also learned that his sister in law, who was his first love and with whom he stayed close after his own marriage, had died.  He incorporates some songs that he had written for her in the piece, and the juxtaposition of the symphonic scope of the work with the interludes of aching nostalgia is irresistible.

  It was years before I heard another recording and they all sounded somewhat slick in comparison.  They just don’t seem to be inside the work as my favorite.  Is this for real or was I so shaped by my initial impression.

  Lately I’ve been listening to Alissa Weilerstein with Jiri Behlolavak (who died soon after the recording) and the Czech PO.  I finally have a recording that has supplanted the long term favorite.  I still prefer some of the rubato in Gendron/Haitink, but Weilerstein still dishes the emotion but more as a Polka then a Waltz.  And her tone is golden.  She floats a pianissimo at the end that is to die for

mahler123

 

If you look at how Starker at 11:40 handles what is written as a single bow, it is an  unusual practice at what is an emotional highlight of the concerto.  It is even more brilliantly done in his famous Mercury recording with Dorati.  The only other cellist that breaks up the bar in this way, I think, is Fournier.

In any event, it is but one reason why the Starker remains my favorite.  Not to mention the great Mercury sound.

I have the Mercury Starker, both in SACD and in stereo from one of the big Mercury box reissues.  It is hugely enjoyable.  Ultimately I prefer players with a bigger tone, such as Gendron and Weilerstein

I've been listening to the Jean-Guihen Queyras recording. It's interesting how  interpretations are different now, from when Starker recorded it.

How about Jacqueline du Pre with Barenboim and the Chicago Symphony? How does her interpretation compare to your reference?

 

I’ll have to listen to DuPre again.  My recollection is that Barenboim spends a lot of energy over emoting .