Dynavector Karat 17D2 vs Sumiko Blackbird


I tried doing a search but couldn't find any comparisons. Since the two retails for the same price (or close to it) what are the main sonic difference between the two? I'm aware that one is high output of course.
howie
Both are great matches for the JMW 9 arm from VPI are are popular choices. I own the Karat and considered the Blackbird when I purchased it.
The Karat is a fast, detailed and dynamic cartridge that to my ears is really pretty neutral across the frequency range. I would definitely not put it in the lush and warm sounding category. No problems with tracking and all the soundstaging and imaging tricks are there too. It leaves me wondering what improvement the XX2 would/could possibly make!?

The only Sumiko cart I have experience with is a Blue Point Special (latest version). It was a good cartridge for the money which is why I considered the Blackbird. The BPS got a little edgy when the volume went up and seemed to lose its hold on the music when things got complex.

Good luck.
I agree with Dlwask. I think the Karat has characteristics (especially it's fast resonse) of state of the art cartridges. Obviously it falls short in other areas, but for the price you really get much more. I chose it over the Blackbird as well on my jmw9 tonearm.
Dlwask mentioned the need to add some mass to the headshell and suggests it is not the easiest cartridge to setup, which is one concern of mine considering I'll be setting up my first analog setup. From what I've read, the two cartridges seem pretty close. Harry seems to prefer the Blackbird slightly more (and since he carries dynavector, that's seems something to pay attention to) unless I was using a Dynavector phonostage. But some have reported a certain level of brightness with the Blackbird up high.