Dynavector Karat 17D2 vs Sumiko Blackbird


I tried doing a search but couldn't find any comparisons. Since the two retails for the same price (or close to it) what are the main sonic difference between the two? I'm aware that one is high output of course.
howie
I agree with Dlwask. I think the Karat has characteristics (especially it's fast resonse) of state of the art cartridges. Obviously it falls short in other areas, but for the price you really get much more. I chose it over the Blackbird as well on my jmw9 tonearm.
Dlwask mentioned the need to add some mass to the headshell and suggests it is not the easiest cartridge to setup, which is one concern of mine considering I'll be setting up my first analog setup. From what I've read, the two cartridges seem pretty close. Harry seems to prefer the Blackbird slightly more (and since he carries dynavector, that's seems something to pay attention to) unless I was using a Dynavector phonostage. But some have reported a certain level of brightness with the Blackbird up high.
Which phono stage are you using? You need to consider the low output of the Karat. I'm using a Lehmann Cube SE and the Karats 0.23mV is probably near the limits of that phono stage testing its noise floor (which is really good) and gain stages. The Blackbird is 2.5mV I think which really opens up your options.
The Dyna is easy to set up. I had to get a different counter weight, but that's no problem. VPI carries it.

They are both good cartridges, so either way you'll be happy, but after my Dyna wears out, I'll buy another one. There's nothing at the price range I'd rather have that I've heard anyway.

I'm using a Rogue Audio SS phono stage.
I'll probably go with the Dyna P75 if I'm going with the Karat. Gain is a bit of a worry since I'm using a passive preamp. But I don't listen at too loud of a level so I'm not overly concerned. So no one here has compared both carts?