Eidolon vs Opus


I am thinking of upgrading my speakers from the Avalon Opus to the Eidolon. Assuming my system, and listening room, is commensurate with the Eidolon, what should I expect from the upgrade?

Thanks
Rich Maurin
rmaurin
The Edolon's will give you a bigger sound with greater extension in the bass.

I would strongly suggest you listen to the Kharma speakers. They are much more coherent and much more transparent and resolute. They go deeper and are a HUGE step over the Avalon's.

Are you going to CES? If so, they will be shown with the Tenor's and the LAMM's.
You might want to go to www.avalonacoustics.com and post a question on their forumn. I'm sure that question has been asked before. I have heard both and the Eidolon takes your wonderful speaker to a new level. I'm thinking you like Avalon speakers since you are considering staying in the family. To me they make some of the best speakers around. Try and give them a listen before making the jump but I bet you will be very happy if you move up.
And since then Kharmas have anything more or less listenable under 70 Hz. No wonder that their Ceramic 3.2 are this best sounding model and all their larger models (more bassy) are just a pile of audio junk.

last week ,i listened opus with graaf and eidolon with pass amps.
and as jtinn,
i think that kharma (1.2 or 2.3) are much better.
Rich, The Eidolons continue to be the best speaker I have ever heard, but I've not heard the Kharma's, Sound Lab A-1/U-1 or some other contenders. If Jtinn is not using a fair amount of hypberbole in his comparison -- you should buy the Kharma (but which model is not clear). Jtinn has always seemed to present very fair and balanced information in this forum.

Nonetheless, for my listening preference (acoustic music, primarily classical), the Eidolons are superb speakers. They match the speed, clarity and coherence of electrostactic speakers and they present a holographic soundstage that must be heard to be believed. They are a reasonably easy load to drive, but they will be extremely revealing of everything in the signal path.

To your specific question comparing your current Opus to the Eidolon, Robert Harley wrote an excellent review of the Opus for TAS (Issue 122, Feb/Mar 2000) and made a very detailed comparison of the Opus to the Eidolon. At the time of the review, he had lived with Eidolons for a year and it served as his point of reference. You can download the review from the TAS website for a fee:
http://www.avguide.com/product/Main_Speakers/Speakers/Avalon_Acoustics/Opus/545.jsp

Key points of Harley's comparison:
* Opus has a bit more relaxed sound, being a bit less forward in the upper midrange. It also is described as more forgiving of source and amplification shortcomings.
* The Opus has a similar sound through midrange and treble (same drivers).
* Very different bass reproduction, with Eidolon being "exceptionally smooth and uncolored, with amuscularity and extension not even approached by previous Avalon loudspeakers." The Opus has more midbass coloration, but perhaps more impact that some listeners may prefer - "a better party speaker, the Eidolon a more accurate reference monitor."

Hope this helps. If you like the Opus and value its strengths, I think you will really enjoy the Eidolon. For me, there is a very signigicant and worthwhile improvement in sound reproduction that goes well beyond just a more bass extension.