@hartf36 +1
Equalizer in a Hi Fi system
Just curious to hear everyone’s opinions on using an equalizer in a high end hi fi system. Was at work tonight and killing time and came across a Schitt Loki max $1500 Equalizer with some very good reviews. What are some of the pros / Benefits and cons in using one. Just curious. BTW. I’m talking about a top of the line. Hi end equalizer. Mostly to calm some high frequencies and some bad recordings.
- ...
- 739 posts total
I love EQ, and have several studio eqs, but I really only keep one on the output of my phono preamp, for eq'ing vinyl playback. My eq of choice right now is the Vintage Audio M3D Skyline. It's a 6 band EQ with very wiiiide bands for minimal phase shift. Plus it has hardwire bypass, and has balanced I/O only. @tlcocks I owned the Charter Oak PEQ-1 for several years when it first came out. I loved the sound of the bands, and the way it operated, but the unit was not totally transparent, even when in bypass. It's not a true hardwire bypass. @sudnh So having an EQ is not high end? REALLY? So what about all the mediocre vinyl pressings that I have, that I can make sound amazing by restoring the lost low frequencies, or re-shaping the highs?? Am I supposed to suffer with mediocre playback in the name of purism and following your "high-end" rules against EQ? Yes, I've read years and years of Stereophile and Absolute Sound diatribe, and always hated that they vilifyied EQ. Look.... I know I've got a great system with good room acoustics, because when I play well recorded, well mastered records, my system sounds perfect. But when I put on a record that has about 5 dB of lows rolled off to accommodate 20 minutes per side, why should I have to live with that? I know I can make it BETTER.... Yes I said it.... EQ can make it BETTER, even though I am putting more circuitry in the signal path! Sorry if that offends the purists. (actually.... No.... not sorry).
|
- 739 posts total