Gamut D200?


what's the difrence between GAMUT D200 and PLINIUS 250mk4?
musicland
I agree with stereodad. Mr. Corn's (sometimes good sometimes trite) remarks seem to ALWAYS slip past the curchlady censor of this site. What gives?
Is Mr. Corn an owner at Audiogon?
Dear Dad- CFB has been around longer than you and added more to discussions. He's entitled to a little fun.
The GAMUT is not exactly high current and has problems driving low impedance speakers. This is a minor drawback considering its world-class sound. I have heard both amplifiers and I prefer the Gamut by a small margin. The monstrous PLINIUS, on the other hand, can drive any speaker extant. Compared to the GAMUT, it sounds a tad sweeter and a bit less detailed.

I am quite chagrined that Mr. Cornfedboy's puerile response has become the topic of this thread, and not the question posted by Mr. Musicland. Let's not forget the purpose of this forum.
I agree with the analysis of Aisip above. I own both the Plinius SA-250Mk IV and GamuT D200 -using the Plinius on the woofers and the GamuT on the towers of the Nearfield Acoustics Pipedreams Loudspeakers. One additional comment- the soundstaging of the GamuT amp is without peer, Tube or SS, in my experience.