Has anyone heard the new North American products preamp and amp?

Geoffkait

The precision of the auto focus circuitry relies on quantum mechanics to function properly. It extends the sensitivity of the velocity detection by massive amounts. The last few years of my work has been trying to accurately detect the flow or motion of the sound [wave] itself. The music information is clearly present in the electrical signal - but embedded deeper down in the signal (at a "DNA" level) is the stored data that reveals the pinpoint location of sound objects in a captured venue. It is tied directly to the flow rate or velocity of a traversing signal as it passes through an amplifier.

The wave phenomenon can be tangible or intangible depending on the medium.

Try this…

You are at a baseball game and the fans at one end of the stadium start what is known as the "wave". Fans stand up and raise their arms and sit down as fans next to them follow the same pattern. To fans across the other side of the stadium it appears that there is a continuous movement or flow of the "gesture".  There is no physical transfer of anything between fans but you can observe the wave phenomenon as something flowing and at any one instant you even know where it has passed and how long it took to get there.

The wave part of a sound waves is the critical key to recovering not only the accurate measurements of instantaneous air pressure – but it also reveals when [time] and where [location] the change in air pressure began. At the venue from your seat, you are listening to an historical event due to the delivery time. It is important to note that the slight delay (delivery offset in time) caused by the distance the waves travel is automatically ignored and removed by the ear-brain system as long as it is close enough to the source and you do not have visual clues (when you observe a drum being struck). That air pressure data rides on the wave which can be considered the carrier (like an AM radio transmission, you must be tuned to the carrier to recover the audio)

When the flow rate cannot be identified or it acts more like FM where the carrier frequency is intentionally modulated (horizontal axis) with audio – the location and pitch of sound objects has become unstable. The amount of instability is proportional to the degree of (velocity) contamination caused by microscopic alterations in the time domain. Under these conditions the “delivery offset” cannot be ignored by the ear-brain system because it is varying therefore the apparent distance between you and the performance is not constant.  This causes a secondary tracking event by the brain to deal with an offset that keeps changing. THIS DISTRACTION ALONE IS THE RED FLAG THAT TELLS YOUR BRAIN IT IS FAKE. In the absence of this variation - your brain is free to use the default (high level conversion) of streaming sound entering the brain at a CONSTANT speed of (750 mph). This is not an option. It is 100% necessary for events to sound "live" to your brain.

A “carrier” implies a frequency or an AC component – The speed of sound is more like DC because of the continuous flow in one direction. (Not having to return back to the stage).

At no time is this technique used to "enhance" or create some dimensional perspective that is not literally contained in the original sound wave.  

The bottom line is the successful "conversion" of information that has gone through 2 types of mediums where the output method (final translation at the speaker) is talking the same language that you brain understands.

Roger

Roger, do you have a means of measuring this phenomena?

I had to create a device that was dead quiet and begins tracking at 0.07 nano volts. The quantum reference thread used to detect velocity has an extremely high Z. (90+ gig). The velocity control system is driven directly from this process which squeezes the signal [gauge] into a virtual plasma. The plasma is also high Z. The thread is then combined with the signal at the plasma level to ensure impedance matching.The signal is suspended this way so the auto focus circuitry can fully dominate the signal velocity while preventing it from "touching" the surrounding template and support circuitry. This keeps contamination out of the signal.

The velocity control system is a twin running shift generator (red shift - blue shift) which is held to a servo neutral point under tremendous pressure.
Once detected, extremely tiny amounts of signal velocity are met with a counter measure (injected into the plasma) of greater than 700 db in real time.

700db? I’m sure you must realize how improbable this statement is, so I’m sure this is a typo. What did you really mean?

atmasphere

700db? I'm sure you must realize how improbable this statement is, so I'm sure this is a typo. What did you really mean.  

It is not a typo.  Seven hundred decibels.

I have been busy developing RAW amplification in that range with the help of quantum physics to remove anything that causes instability. That was not easy.

The signal current is down converted in thickness so it can be combined with the quantum thread. The reaction that takes place at that level results in a massive signal (output) that contains the exact velocity of the streaming audio signal.

When combined with the sensitivity of the shift generators it is closer to 800 db. It all happens in a single point that is housed in a Faraday cage and buried in pure copper.

This is why it has resolution of biblical proportions.

Roger

800db?? Lesse... 700 db is 10 to the 35th power or so... 800 db is 10 to the 40th power. Obviously the statement is ridiculous.

No wonder you don't have a means of measurement.

Now the problem here of course if that you have a circuit that can do the process, but no means of measurement, as nothing exists that can deal with numbers that small. Imagine a voltage that is 0. followed with 39 zeros after the dot before we see any significant digits and we see right away that no instrumentation anywhere in the world is that sensitive.

I hope the contradiction is obvious and not lost on anyone?

Occam's Razor says there is a much simpler explanation.

Roger, it might be that you have build some equipment that sounds good, and that being the case there is no reason to concoct these stories. Just let the qualities of the gear stand on its own. Other people's testimony is always far better than that of the manufacturer! OTOH, when you make comments like this, credibility suffers (to say the least) when read by people that went to school. The more you try to explain it, the deeper the hole you have dug yourself into.

atmasphere, since I started this thread making exactly your main point, namely let this amp prove itself, as it has with all the first adopters, you are the point who is digging a hole for yourself, as you have no credence in discussing how it works. I think Roger is telling critics like you far too much. I personally have no use for EEs as that field has greatly regimented positions that we know everything. The best amp and preamps are not by EEs. Mainly those well versed by the US military training in electronics dominate the innovators. 

I do agree with you that Roger should let you guys die on the vine. When more people hear these units, no erstwhile credentials will give any of you, credence in its merits.