Hiface EVO, Wavelink, Audiophilleo

I have a Wavelength Wavelink right now and comparing it with my Lynx AES 16. My initial impression is that the Lynx card is still a little superior; wider and deeper image. So as to take the cables out of the equation, I borrowed MIT MA-X Oracle interconnects (AES for Lynx and SPDIF and Locus Axis for Wavelength) to do my little comparison. I have them running simultaneously in JRMC zones 1 and 2 into my NAD M2 which makes it easy to switch inputs on the NAD to immediately hear the difference.

I just got the Wavelink today, so I want to let it go a bit before I make any definitive statements. BTW, I am using an Antelope DA re-clocker between my Lynx card and NAD M2 which gives me galvanic isolation and allows me to use a high end cable like the MIT MA-X, which does make a huge difference on its own.

Three things I demand for Customer Service in PC Audio, this includes ALL Devices $300.00 and above. A Paper User
Manual (just to make sure), A Hard Disk containing Drivers
and any required Software (just to make sure), and the above Tools written in English-English-English (just to make sure)! No more Online crap shoots just to save the
Company a Buck, and make the Customer work harder, not to
mention putting the Customer at risk for Worms, Viruses,
Spyware, Malware......etc. If I have to buy the damn Tree,
($500.00 Device) so be it! This is non-negotiatable. If I
have to re-invent the Wheel, and draw a Blueprint for
Customer Service in PC Audio, I will try my best to fill that Vacuum. Mother Nature abhores a Vacuum, and I am a
Creature of Nature, so I abhore Vacuums as well! I am not afraid to criticize PC Audio, I am not a Blind Pundit of
PC Audio, I demand the same Customer Service provided by any other Product I might buy. If PC Audio falls flat on its marketing face, due to a vacuum of Customer Service, I am not going to be the Blind Tool Pundit to break its fall! PC Audio either stands on its own two feet in the
Marketplace, (Read Customer Service), or it deserves to fall! PC Audio will not be successful the way it is going,
it is only a matter of time before everyone gets tired of
dealing with the B.S., as I have! How can you possibly have Convenience in a Vacuum of Customer Service, it just
doesn't add up no matter how you crunch the numbers! How do you like the words, "Mass Exodus"! Keep on defending a
Vacuum, and you will learn the meaning of those words!

Pettyofficer, once it's set up, how does the Evo sound? I am interested in the 24/192 capability for storing/archiving LPs. I would be comparing this to a Bel Canto Lightlink, using the ST-glass interface, into a Bel Canto DAC 3.5vb, in a MAC mini setup. (The Lightlink is limited to 24/96.)

Jbaxley- the EVO works fine when set up. It does sound really well, with perhaps a slight emthasis in the mid-range. With my System it could perhaps use it a little;
but, very damn little. I still concider the EVO like an
external Digital SoundCard with its own Power Supply, a means to avoid PC Switching Mode Power Supply. For me
this is a must have. I am currently using a Space Tech Labs DA-64 XT Super DAC, with four large Tubes in the
output Stage, and two Huge Tubes in the Power Rectifier.
Tubes are highly succeptible to Power Supply Related Noise
from Switching Mode Power Supply. This is only particular
to the type of DAC that I use, other DAC's probably have no
problem. I use this DAC because I like its sound, and mostly listen to 24/96 material-the upper limit of the
DA-64. Still concidering 24/192 DAC, but still love the
sound of Tubes! Some prefer ST-glass interface for Digital,
I prefer AES/EBU, I believe that this is mostly DAC dependent. The same goes for Power Supply and Tube/Solid
State for the DAC. Are you using USB from MAC mini to Bel
Canto Lightlink, then ST-glass to Bel Canto DAC? EVO has
USB-ST Input, but I2S-S/pdif coax-S/pdif bnc-and AES/EBU
Digital Outputs. Will Bel Canto DAC work better with AES/EBU or ST-glass Interface? I don't know. You might try
to find someone using an EVO with Bel Canto DAC, here or
where-ever. I am also fearful of obsoleteness due to 24/192, but still getting some really damn good sound from
24/96 and Re-mastered CD. 24/192 wasn't the real reason that I got the EVO. Is it fear, the Numbers Game, or a real substantial improvement with 24/192. 24/96 Downmixed
Music Surround Sound still blows me away! It is certainly not your Daddy's Movie Surround Sound.

I have been using the Wavelink for several months now and its an amazing little box that meets all my expectations. I have gone through the whole comparison exercise here: http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=84115.0

The best is to have a home demo and hear for yourself...