I need, alas, some ''theory'' to explain what I mean. There is
this ''truth by conditions'' theory ascribed to Tarski. The ''model'' is
simple:
1. For all x Fx & Gx
2. For some x Fx&Gx
The first sentence is not true if there is just one object which does
not satisfy conditions F and G.
The second sentence is true if there is at least one object which
satisfy both F and G conditions.
Popper used this ''model'' by his ''Conjectures and Refutations''.
The statement ''all swans are white'' is refuted with one black
swan. For this purpose he brought one black swan from Australia
to England by some Philosophical gathering and demonstrated
his black swan to perplexed English colleague. The most thought
that he simply painted one white swan in black.
Well this is my introduction with my intention to refute chakster
theory about correlation between moving mass and details.
Many of us are familiar with those EMT cartridges. What is
curious by them is the output. We are used to low output
carts with probable assumption that they need less wire for
their coils. However this cart produces 0,9 mV output which
is like our ''black swan''. To put this otherwise this is an
contra example which according to our first ''model'' make
the whole theory not true (grin).
