2. amps-preamps
  3. 1207683122

HK Signature 2.0 or NuForce AVP-16

I've started to rethink my original idea of getting an HK AVR-247 as a pre-pro for stereo/surround. Current contenders are the HK Sig 2.0 and NuForce AVP-16 for ~$300 and ~$900, respectively. I love the minimalistic look of the Sig 2.0, but am concerned about its digital processing of analog inputs. I'm also open to other options. One of which is to forget all this and hold off for a GFA-750.

I see that the NuForce is highly regarded here, but is there anyone who has heard either or all and can offer insight? My priority is music w/ HT as an added bonus. As I've yet to hear either unit, I'm currently leaning towards Sig 2.0 b/c of price and minimalistic look, but SQ takes priority. Below is my current set-up.

Adcom GFA-5802
Adcom GTP-500II
Boston Acoustics VR3 - front
Boston Acoustics CR75 - rear
biturbo
biturbo OP
4 posts
 
AVP2 (incl +6) is a bit more than I want to spend right now. And as mentioned, I'm just looking for basic surround. I have a GFA-5200 waiting for the rear set-up and it'll be a while before I drop more money for the center channel driver and amplification. The original AVP seems to be just right in many regards. Thank you for the feedback!

Robr45 -- you're definitely right... there's plenty of equipment to be had for a good value. I'll just have to wait and see if a pre-pro can match stereo abilities of a dedicated pre.
elevick
2,636 posts
 
If you are in the $800 range, my choice hands down is the Anthem AVM-2. Amazing sound and quality. Very nice remote. I like the sound much better than the "sterile" sound of the AVP2.
Either one will blow away the 2.1 WHICH IS OBSOLETE. Nice DACs, lots of digital and balance inputs/outputs, good on screen displays.
biturbo OP
4 posts
 
Have you owned both units? Would you mind describing the differences in sound b/w the two and what in particular you're referring to when you say "sterile"?

Is AVM-20 comparable? Better?
More to discover