How crucial is the quality of a digital cable?


I recently purchased a Cambridge Audio CX 81 integrated amp. The analog inputs sound great, but I find the internal DAC to be a disappointment. It uses the ESS Sabre ES9016K2M chip. I use a mid-level Rotel RCD 951 CD deck as a transport via the digital coax. I also hooked the deck via the analog out, just to compare. The analog interconnects are entry level AQ's. The digital coax is an Amazon purchase in the $15 range. I find the internal DAC of the 20 year old Rotel to be superior to the new AX 81, when doing an A/B.

What then confuses me is that the Blue Tooth streaming from the amp is quite good. It is HD aptX,  24-bit/84kHz capable. But, wouldn't that also go through the same internal DAC? Could it be the mediocre Amazon digital coax cable? I always assumed that digital cable quality was less significant than analog cables. Just bits and bites, right?

If someone knows of a decent digital coax for under $50, I would be very grateful. I would also appreciate any advice on an entry level power cord for the amp. Can a decent power cord be had for under $100? 

 

motown-l

Digital coax cables do make a difference. I’ve owned about 6 or 7, finally achieving the synergy I was looking for. It’s not just 0’s and 1’s. It’s the internal design and construction of the cable to keep the signal moving in a pathway without reflections inside the cable. Also the 75ohm impedance needs to match the impedance of the source output and input to the dac.

1.5 meter length is often the optimal length for the coax. And high cost doesn't mean higher quality.

 

Quality always matters. Luckily making  a quality digital cable is not rocket science so that’s good from a cost perspective. 

Spend a little more.

 

 

If that’s your maximum budget then this a very nice cable. Haven’t used the Canare in years but remember it was a fairly smooth sounding cable, not the most transparent but pleasant sounding

 

 

Mogami is always a safe and relatively affordable  bet for quality wires.