How important is it for you to attain a holographic image?


I’m wondering how many A’goners consider a holographic image a must for them to enjoy their systems?  Also, how many achieve this effect on a majority of recordings?
Is good soundstaging enough, or must a three dimensional image be attained in all cases.  Indeed, is it possible to always achieve it?

128x128rvpiano

Some of the responses remind me of the fox and the grapes, if any of you remember that fable; after not being able to reach the grapes, he decided they were green. It took me years to get a holographic sound stage, but when I got it, I knew I had arrived.

Not only does it require knowledge, but top notch components as well.

"There are many who pretend to despise and belittle that which is beyond their reach."


While a holographic sound stage is not beyond anyone's reach that has responded to this thread, it does require knowledge and effort.

I'm 65, been playing with this stuff back when we use to get the digest sized 'Audio Mart' in the mail every month. The fun we had with the anticipation of looking at those ads every month. 
To continue our discussion: I would simply like to state that the more I can control my rooms 'interference' with the original signal being launched from my speaker driver, the more stuff I hear in my music when I listen. Those interesting comments we make to ourselves like 'I never heard that before'. I was never really trying to get the holographic effect in my sound stage, quite honestly I noticed it just happened when the room quit interfering...

Romeo, many important discoveries have been made by accident; I'm happy that you are enjoying holography at last, now you can enjoy each artist independently.
I think that as many have mentioned here it just depends on what you're after. I care nothing for "3D" movies and would never try to simulate that at home. I'm sure that with the right money, equipment, expertise and room that I could do it but why would I when I've seen the very best and didn't care for it?

The point is, it isn't sour grapes to decide that you don't want or need some holographic effect that, as had been mentioned, requires knowledge, money, equipment and expertise. The truth is, that sentiment does not just come from those who have never experienced it. There are audio critics who have heard the best there is to hear and still don't put it at the top of their list of criteria that are important to them. Just Google it.

And I think that is an inherent problem in the audiophile world. There is always this notion that someone has heard something that if everyone else could hear it they would love it and if they haven't heard it then they are claiming sour grapes. I like the grapes I can reach. I can acknowledge that the grapes I can't reach might be delicious but why make myself unhappy when I can't (or don't need to) reach them anyway?

n80, it's for sure you can't miss what you never had. Unfortunately, those high end salons no longer exist that presented you music in a fashion that you had never heard before, but once you heard, there was no putting that Genie back in the bottle; you had to have it.

As I stated before, at those shows with the worlds best audio, I doubt if anywhere had a good holographic image because of the numerous requirement in addition to the equipment that are required. The salons had the rooms, and audio fanatics who could put it altogether.

The bottom line is the music, and not the equipment; having the music that makes you happy is most important.