ICE amps need cooling?


I've been looking for an amp to power my Maggies and was doing some research on these ICE modules from B&O. While reading the data sheet I saw that the model 1000 that puts out 525 watts into 8 Ohms and 1,000 watts into 4 Ohms it gave a specification of Power(FTC) of 80 watts continuous. Now I remember back in the 70's during the receiver wars the FTC mandated that power ratings be standardized to something like "100 wpc continuous into 8 Ohms with no more than X% distortion" This was to stop all the unrealistic power claims of huge power output for a brief time under tremendous distortion. It made the playing field level so consumers could at least get what they were expecting. So I see that the ICE module has a power rating of only 80 watts continuous! Now that is a far cry from the 500 watts they are bragging about. Have all amplifier specs abandoned the FTC ruling, or is the ICE module just blowing smoke? The B&O site also stated that with heat sinks or fan cooling the power rating could go up. Most ICE amps I see on the market don't have any heat sinks or even ventilation for that matter. So are we all buying ICE amps that can deliver their stated output power for only brief times, and actually put out only a fraction of the power for any sustained period of time? I'm no expert and I just saw this today so I am asking the the members with lots of knowledge in this area to respond and please clear this up. Thanks.
koestner
Most recent JRDG amps use SMPS, including the 312 stereo, which is designed around the ASP1000 module. While 300 series amps have substantive cast Aluminum cooling fins, I suspect these may be more cosmetic than anything else, as the external temp of 312 never grows much above look warm. It is worth pointing out that at approx $16K, the 312's price point is not exactly consumer grade, yet Jeff Rowland determined that an SMPS front loaded by a PFC unit would yield a musical performance superior to that of the previous 302 model, which used a linear power supply instead. . . and I do agree with him. Issue 188 of TAS should just be reaching the newsstands. . . it contains a sidebar that I have written on the JRDG 312 amp--part of my review article on Vienna Mahler speakers.
On the subject of battery PS, JRDG has implemented a battery PS on its new Criterion linestage flagship. . . which hopefully will ship before year end. G.
Batteries are potentially messy and some can emit either fumes or hydrogen gas. Enough battery power for a pair of BelCanto 1kw monoblocs would take up a bunch of space, too.
Than you gotta deal with the charger and battery maintenance.
You would ALWAYS run the batteries down at the WRONG time. that is one of the RULES.
But, on the other hand, I just received an IR amplifier module, stereo class 'd' which I intend to power with batteries. Amp takes +-50v which is good for 4x12 on each rail. I'll deal with the charging and other issues later. The attraction of zero ripple and huge, near-instant current is very seductive.
Battery chemistries other than lead-acid / gel cell is available in Lithium/Lithium polymer and varios Nickel Metal Hydride cells along with the old standby, NiCad. I don't know the half cell voltage of these, but some require smart chargers (the charger, not YOU) and certain other usage restrictions.
For DIY where there are few restrictions, it's worth an experiment, but in the commercial market, batteries may be too much.
Also, a note on the numbers:: IF you run at what works out to be high power levels, say 4 amp total average draw, on each 'rail', you may need considerable battery capacity. A set of batteries in series will have the amp hour capacity of 1 battery.....1 12v battery of 50amp/hours will still have 50amp hours when 4 are in series....but have 4X the WATT hours.(P=IE) But, measuring in amp hours, my made-up 4amp draw, per rail, will use up each rails batteries in 10 hours of listening, with a small reserve.
Clearly, in this instance you couldn't run a Class 'A' system, but rather the numbers prefer Class 'D'.....
Magfan, the old JRDG model 9 mono amp used sealed Lead acid batteries. It as a class A/B design. Conversely, the JRDG Criterion linestage uses industrial-grade NiMH and has a built in smart charger.
Muralman1...Nice that Mr Ho's preamp is "Class A". By the way, how do you make a preamp that is anything else? Can you name one?
How much power in the JRDG#9? How much battery capacity? That'll give me some idea how long between charges.

I was just giving some 'considerations'. If you go with lead/acid or Nicad, you've got shipping weight to factor in, too. No Fair giving the UPS guy a hernia luggin 80lb of class 'a' chassis and another 200lb of batteries!
I work for International Rectifier, which has several class'd' entries, of which I own one. I am attracted to the battery PS simply because I don't have the skillset to design a good, clean PS, though I suspect I could build it if given a kit of parts..........

I can close to guarantee that the above amp had some problems. Perhaps battery storage with the fumes? That stuff is Really corrosive. I suspect that using some Optima sealed gel cells for automotive use may help. I further suspect the WAF is near zero. How you hide a dozen car batteries 'discreetly' is beyond me!

Thanks for the Info, which I'll look up. I have also seen, here on the 'gon, an amp called 'Emitter'.....something, which is a massive battery operated power amp. And, Massively Expensive, to boot. It is in the 25,000$ range, new.

My 'rule' is that there is NO bad topology of whatever ilk. Almost anything can be made, and made good / good sounding...some stuff just takes more development, parts count and is inherently more expensive. Arguing about what sounds better a SET or Triode or whatever tube philosophy is not the correct approach, IMO. How's it sound? Some arguements about this stuff is starting to sound religious.
The little Sonic Impact "T_Amp" uses 12-14 volts, so a single car battery would be sufficient. Since music requires only a few watts, and the amp is something like 80 percent efficient it would play for a long time before the battery would need recharge.

magfan, JRDG Model 9 monos yield 350W per channel with max current of of 70Amps continuous
http://jeffrowland.com/ClassicSpecs.htm#M9
Batteries were housed in chassis matching the main units. No WAF issues on JRDG products to the best of my knowledge. I have not heard the Model 9, so I can't comment directly on its sound. I have no idea if JRDG plans future class D amps with battery PS. Only Criterion linestage has batteries. . . . and I have only heard it running on AC this far.