Interesting situation! Do we need this....

@petar3 ,

I find your comment unfounded. There is much to discuss and banning a topic because you cannot perceive what could be discussed is not a good course for a discussion forum. If one does not have anything to contribute, one is not forced to contribute. Does this inexpensive speaker have a good dispersion pattern? Do most very small speakers have somewhat good dispersion by virtue of their size and driver sizes? If you listen at reduced volumes, can even relatively low cost drivers achieve suitably low distortion for listening enjoyment? Are there some particular aspects of this speaker and drivers that lends itself to superior low cost implementations?

Many of the posters are starting off with the assumption these speakers cannot possibly sound "good". Maybe they should wonder why their expensive speakers do not sound better.

thanks for getting back to me. your response proves my point since you've turned from discussing YOUR appreciation of these speakers to their qualities which is what you should have started with.

"I find your comment unfounded. There is much to discuss and banning a topic because you cannot perceive what could be discussed is not a good course for a discussion forum. If one does not have anything to contribute, one is not forced to contribute. Does this inexpensive speaker have a good dispersion pattern? Do most very small speakers have somewhat good dispersion by virtue of their size and driver sizes? If you listen at reduced volumes, can even relatively low cost drivers achieve suitably low distortion for listening enjoyment? Are there some particular aspects of this speaker and drivers that lends itself to superior low cost implementations?

Many of the posters are starting off with the assumption these speakers cannot possibly sound "good". Maybe they should wonder why their expensive speakers do not sound better.

Peter3..."but I think that the OP is really looking for validation that cheap speakers can sound good to him."

Once again, you simply don't get the jist of the post. It has nothing to do whether the speakers sound good or bad or ARE good or bad.....It is all about the fact that I enjoyed 6 hours of listening to very inexpensive speakers.......They fulfilled my need that night for an evening of music enjoyment. The point is, how "good" do speakers need to be to enjoy them.....

@rbertalotto
Congratulations on finding something you truly enjoy, that’s the main thing

That being said, when you use “we” is likely rubbing some people the wrong way as it seems you are speaking for all of us which I disagree- Audio price/performance is subjective 

I think what is interesting about the situation is that the op inadvertently listened blind, and was surprised by the enjoyment. I’ve been through this myself many times, discovering that my ability to discern sound quality is much higher than my need for it for optimal musical enjoyment. At a certain point it’s just a curiosity, a freakish thing that a sound system can be so accurate and capable down to the finest minutia, but I get bored with that aspect of it. In building my own speakers, attempting to get to a higher level of performance is a lot of fun. It’s an attempt to pull of a stunt and I’m happy when I do it, but then I need to find something new to do, so I try something new and then people say "Won’t you ever find the system you’re truly happy to listen to and enjoy music with?" My answer is that’s way too easy. I’ve had dozens of those systems.

Another thing I will say about this is that the pursuit of ultra high end sound quality for the sake of musical enjoyment has a certain self defeating quality to it for me. It never sounds quite like live musicians. There are too many complications for that to happen. So no matter what it’s a compromised presentation. But that’s ok because it doesn’t have to be perfect. So if it’s not going to be perfect because it can’t be, it’ fine if it’s imperfect in a number of different ways about equally. If it’s got certain things uncannily accurate while it still suffers from built in issues with the way recordings are made and the limited number of speakers, inter aural crosstalk, all that, then it actually can become distracting. To my ear the electronics and speaker quality pretty quickly can get way out ahead of the quality limitations inherent in a 2 channel recording played into both ears at the same time in a room that is invariably coloring the sound. If I’m going to work on something I’m going to be looking for new and novel ways to present the sound differently - a more holistic approach rather than squinting at minutia like the sound differences of dacs or speaker cables. To me it’s case of straining at gnats while swallowing camels. But to each his own! One person’s camel may be another’s gnat.

I’ll bring up another point that’s similar to me - perfect blacks on OLED TVs. I went with a mini LED even though I can see the blooming. It’s no big deal to me because I don’t typically watch in a perfectly dark room, and a lot of the content that I enjoy has a lot of brightness all over the screen. So the overall persistent brightness limit is more of a big deal to me than the perfect blacks, which I have trouble seeing most of the time because of the lighting in the room and my own eyes and glasses causing glare. The biggest thing I notice, especially in outdoor daylight scenes, is that clouds and glare on water and stuff like that are much, much brighter than TVs can currently produce. I don’t see a lot of perfect blacks anywhere in my world.