Is using streaming services worthy of an audiophile?


I read that a lot of people on this forum use Tidal etc. Is this ok from audiophile perspective? I mean, do people who use such services actually know what quality is streamed? Don’t you lose all control over your music when you surrender to streaming services?
defiantboomerang
defiantboomerang


As and old music lover/audiophile ( is there such a thing? ) I will relay my steps towards streaming. 
I purchased a really nice dac you may be able to use your CD player. At first I started burning my CDs onto my laptop using JRiver software. For me I really didn't like looking at my computer while listening and trying to enjoy music. I purchased a Melco N1 at 2k. Then a comparable Buffalo burner. Now I burn my CDs to the Melco at the same time I use it to play music. So the Melco is a library and player with 2 terabytes plus unlimited external storage. I loaded up a " remote " app on my IPad and use that to control the Melco, which has its own software. 
Now I have almost all my CDs recored and playable. I like the sound quality better then any player I have owned, and I have easier access.  
Haven't gotten into streaming yet, a friend of mine had stored a huge collection of CDs, put them on a hard drive which I downloaded to the Melco, now I have so much music don't know how long it will take to listen to all of it. When I get board I may go to streaming. 

Just a thought. 


I would say that you're in the right forest, but barking up the wrong tree.   I believe that Audiogon members enjoy EQUIPMENT on a much deeper level.

It's true that there are a lot of equipment junkies on all the forums.  I like to get people off that train and into the psychological benefits of music.  Once you achieve sound quality that exceeds vinyl, you forget about the equipment.  It is possible.  I've had several customers sell their vinyl systems, not because they were inconvenient, but because their digital sounded better.

Defiant - If you are after the highest sound quality, the format of your rips should be .wav.  Even uncompressed FLAC has SQ issues.  Tags are an issue, but I put up with that for the better SQ.

The important thing to remember with all digital is that jitter is the #1 thing that will reduce the SQ.  The interface between the computer and the D/A is the critical part, whether its USB, Ethernet or S/PDIF, as well as the master clock in that interface.

Steve N.

Empirical Audio

It depends.  For me Tidal is about convenience when I don't have time, or don't want to play an album or dig out a CD.  I also use Audrivana for my DSD's, but I love the selection of Tidal, and I'll tell you sounds pretty good coming out of my Legacy Classic HD's.  Sure, there is a bit of SQ drop off as compared to my other media but it's about finding new music and ease.  I also run Tidal on my built in speakers around the house when entertaining as I've built some great playlists.  

I may get roasted for this, but you don't have to be an "audiophile" 100% of the time.  Sometimes more than not it's about the music you enjoy listening too, versus listening to the perfect recordings to get the most out of your system.
“you don’t have to be an "audiophile" 100% of the time“

@dhpeck,

I get what you saying, more than often I enjoy listening to Tidal through my SONOS speakers placed throughout the house instead of heading to my dedicated audio room.
Sounds like I am not the only one who has added a Tidal feed to other parts of the house bar the "audio room".

However my findings are that Tidal streamed through my Bluesound Vault 2 and fed via digital coax to my exogal comet plus out to BAT power amp and into Wilson witt speakers sounds noticeably better than CD Redbook playback or even ripped wav files. That is to my ears in my system.
Especially the Tidal masters at 96 and up depending on the release.