2. amps-preamps
  3. 1059108767

Krell --- Are the Newer designs better?

After hearing all the Krell hatred for so many years, I never thought I would consider a Krell amp -- thin, steely highs -- recessed, distant midrange -- sterile, lifeless sound.............should I have believed what many said?

Then, after reading more recent reviews of the FPB series amps, I got the distinct impression that the sonics have improved to the point that the amps are now in the top class of solid state sound. Even the infamous Jonathan Scull thought it a great amplifier.

However, there are proponents of the older amps, saying they sounded the best. Krell, like Levinson, seems to have polarized audiophiles -- either they like it, or they hate it. What have your experiences been with the different Krells, and how do they measure up to the competition, such as Pass, Rowland, Gamut, Plinius? By the way, I should point out that I am a tube guy, so few solid state amps have floated my boat, the Boulder 1060 being one of them.
kevziek
jayctoy's avatar
jayctoy
4,093 posts
 
if you are a tube guy, I agree you will not like
Krell,even Levinsons, unless if the amp sounds
closer to tubes,In my experience the Plinius
is a tube sounding amp,I have it for many years
now,In my system Krell FPB300 sounds very good, but
its not musical,who knows, for you to know audition
them,Also the FPB 300 I auditioned, does not allow
you to use tube preamp,but they say you need ajustment
on the amp.If I were you, if you plan to use it
tube preamp, I will check first.Good Luck
hiend2's avatar
hiend2
424 posts
 
Had 3 ksa250's and a 300S loved them all id take the 300s for most demanding speakers and the 250 for brite speakers. These are nice amps. Not as dynamic in the highs as some which can be a godsend. The ksa amps are requiring cap replacements now as they get 10years+ Something to think about all will need this or amp will not opperate after caps get leakey. Once krell replaces the caps amp will sound better then new!! Pay around 2500 for a overhauled ksa250 you will not regret it. Can be converted into MDA 500 mono blocks for around 3000 a pair. God are those nice.
rwwear
2,868 posts
 
I have used my 600c with a tube amp for a couple of years with no problem. You have to watch out for the one's that leak DC like some of the BAT preamps. I have tried a BAT with my Krell without incident however. I have seen the BAT preamps shut down a McCormack though.
johnk's avatar
johnk
1,975 posts
 
I am a tube guy but have owned 2 krell amps and a preamp .I found the fpb200c to sound better than the fpb300.Krells are wonderful amps great bass drive ,not much grain.Wish I still had the fpb200c It would make a great bass amp with my wavac running my horns .Still they dont have that majic sound my tube gear gives me .When I would listen to my krell system it would sounded amazing but after awhile it does not hold your atention like my SET and horns do.A least for me /JK
kevziek OP
323 posts
 
Some of you commented that the KSA250 is softer on the highs, or less dynamic on the highs. I don't know if I equate this with a 'tube sound'. I actually find my tube amp more lively sounding, and less 'dead' sounding than many SS amps. The SS amps can be brighter, but they can still sound less alive, less real sounding and more mechanical.

Even in this thread, I see a polarity of opinion on Krell. Some say I would not like the sound if I like tubes. Yet at least two others owned tubes and liked their Krells.

The Plinius was mentioned as more tube sounding. However, I again have heard that the Plinius is darker and less-alive sounding. I don't want that type of sound either. So, I guess I still have no clear idea as to what the Krells really sound like.
More to discover