Krell KBL or Krell KRC-3 or neither?


I am still a noob. Here is proof. Is $2800. too much to pay for a Philips DVD727? I know they are only $40. My real questions is:
Does the Krell KRC-3 have a better rep or what charateristics make this cheaper (new $2950.)than the KBL (new $4500.) have a higher used bluebook? Are these worth the $1470 (used) KRC-3 and $450.(current bid) for the KBL?
Is it true that tubes increase or are most suited to mid-range than SS?
Thanks for any input.
BTW...I know some ppl don't care for Klipsch, but my new RF-7s sound so awesome, and they have not yet been broke in. To anyone looking at speakers, (I know my opinion is just the 'flavor-of-the-day' and this is the wrong forum) for $1800. a pair, I am amazed and am finding myself with a big smile on my face wanting to say "these are the best speakers...no, the best sysyem I ever herd!" But, like I said, I am new and have not herd many, if any, good speaker/systems. Just had to SHOUT OUT my happiness.
alburger
Ive owned several Krell amps Ksa250 ksa300s Mda 300 ect.
I was not impressed with the KBL, Just look at that giant board full of parts, Dont need all that circuitry, Try a good tube pre you wont ever look back. Do it now. Anybody with one ear will be able hear the diffrence. Sorry
Thanks for the Krelp. Sorry, could not resist. I just took a crash coarse on room treatment. I was a front-of-house soundman during the nineties and also spent 1000s of hours in an extensively treated enviroment full production recording studio (Woodland West Studios in Olathe, Kansas)Wait, I lived there for a while. (Do you know how much it would have cost me, if I had not taken residence there? 1000s of hours?!) My purpose of that statement was not to boast or imply superior knowledge on my part, quite the contrary, as I am very untechnical. It was to claify my over-extended exposure to the 'studio' life and reason for my prefrences. Studios are acoustically 'dead'. Almost muffled. There is no space or imaging until you panned, overdubbed, etc. Seems like the sound just radiates directly from the monitors to your ears with no space in between. It is too perfect/sterile for casual listening but a necessity for prodution. The instruments all sound 'dead' 'bonedry', until you add sweetness. I dont want that in my listening 'space'. I am however going to get a test CD and SPL meter (gee, should'nt I already have one or five of these already?) and treat the corners behind the speaks. I used to finish soundcheck, tweaking the 'main' rig to the room. An empty usually very reflective surface (try high SPL heavy metal in corragated metal building w/concrete floor, oh yes, cieling arched from the floor). None the less, even in a venue/room that is acoustically friendly to mix in, it all changes when things heat up, and fill up...Wow, I got to get to bed. It is 4:00 in the morning...
Well here is my question