LP's... Do they sound better now than 30 yrs ago?

Inna, that’s fine. Just to be clear, I’m not talking about fixing scratches, it’s more the distortion that you hear when it sounds like the record has been played on a bad record player and the groove noise is high- to the point of distortion. Also, what I call tracing distortion, which is similar- you hear a sort of etched sound from what may have been a misaligned tonearm/cartridge (crystal needle anyone?) from a kludgey old fashioned record player. Sometimes, not always, those kinds of distortion are just a result of crap in the grooves that has been cemented in and it isn’t easy to get it out. Thus, the maniacal cleaning regime on seriously scarce copies. If it is a cheap record, I often just replace it if a couple of cleanings don’t do the trick.

This is going to be fun. 

Here's another 2 cents worth: I have occasionally picked up a rare record in amazing condition at a thrift shop for a buck, whats cool is some of the 60's vinyl is really resilient, and old beat up mono lp's CAN sound amazing with a dedicated mono cartridge (think Audio-Technica AT-3or 33 and others) which seems to eliminate most of the surface noise that a stereo cart will pick-up, HOWEVER if you only have one turntable/tonearm you will want to change the headshell out for ease (maybe an old Technics1200?) for this, another reasonable bullet proof turntable, (as long as it hasn't been DJed to death)

I think, first of all, that the availability of affordable high quality equipment is better today than it was 30 years ago.  I also think that the premium quality vinyl today is better than the premium quality vinyl of yesteryear.  What isn't great is the confusion around what sources are being used for vinyl releases now.  30+ years ago we knew that digital was not a part of the recording process (for the most part), but now when I often buy vinyl reissues of a records that I know were recorded digitally 20 years ago.  Many of them sound far better than their digital release counterparts, so I have to believe that vinyl is superior to CD, but I don't know if this is due to modern technology or a variety of other factors.  All I know is that I buy a lot of new release vinyl these days and most of it sounds really good.  When I play an original from the 70's it sounds nowhere near as good as its reissue (in many cases).  A little research before you buy new vinyl goes a long way towards finding separating the wheat from the chaff.    

@snackeyp

When I play an original from the 70’s it sounds nowhere near as good as its reissue (in many cases).

My experience is totally different. Prefer the original 70s pressing if the reissue is not from the master tape, also depends on who does the remastering for the reissue and where it was pressed today. If we will exclude the very famous artists released on big labels (and reissued by big labels) we will find that some of the obscure artrists nowadays reissued by the small companies that are not technically advanced and noboby really cares about the sound quality that much, the source for reissue of obscure bands is ofter an old vinyl digitalized with average cartridge, then compressed digitally and pressed again on the vinyl in 1000 copies. Same with the 7inch reissues on 45rpm vinyl, original pressings always better. Only big labels can taking care of the top quality reissue if they are planning to sell them in many thousand copies. But hey, what about those unknown releases with great music?