Martin Logan CLS vs. ReQuest

Yes, I'm aware of the need for sub(s).

The question is, all things being equal, if I'd be better served by the CLS or the ReQuests.

BTW, it turns out that the CLS are the 1's, not the 2's as I previously thought.

Present equipment:
Krell KRC-3
Bryston 4B-ST

Its hard to say. Your current speakers are very good. I had Kinergetics Research subs and amps on mine, but you're not likely to find a setup like that. You're probably better off keeping what you have. If you're looking to upgrade, getting a new preamp will make a very big difference.

Heh... well, if you think the Krell preamp is the weak link, you should know it replaced a Mac C28, so I'm still way ahead of the game.  :-)

You should be able to get louder db levels from the Request's for hard hitting music.
But if you like to listen at moderate levels and to middle of the road, chamber or orchestral music the the CSL's would be less coloured and more truthful to the source also more agile, but not so hard hitting in the bass.

Cheers George   

Had every incarnation of CLSes and subs over the course of 15 years, and enjoyed them immensely. They are as others have indicated, highly revelatory, especially with small scale music. I have never encountered a better speaker system for reproducing stringed instruments, especially acoustic guitar. They are fragile, however, and struggle in reproducing complex music with large dynamic swings, even when supported by the best subwoofers. Consequently, the Requests are, in my opinion, the more versatile, and perhaps the more satisfying speaker for reproducing a broader range of music. BTW: If you can swing the cost, or can find a great deal, the most recent M-L hybrids may be the best speakers they have ever made, and display none of the weaknesses of the CLS, or the earlier hybrids, such as the Request.