Neutral electronics are a farce...

Roger wrote,

"geoffkait,

With all due respect - I don’t owe anyone an explanation for anything I do.
You can’t get passed the basics of my concept of constant velocity amplification even after trying 6 different ways to explain it. It obviously will never compute. 700 db doesn’t have to be scary."

I actually understood your argument concerning speed of sound in air. I never said it was impossible or any such thing. Although I can certainly understand your defensive posture, I actually might be the only one who did understand your explanation from what I can tell. Also, just for the record I’m not the one who challenged you on the 700 dB thing. That happens to have been someone else. What I did challenge on was your name dropping of the fancy expression quantum mechanics, which although you continue to use it you have failed rather conspicuously to explain what you mean.

"Here is another fact - you can’t win this argument."

I wouldn’t bet on it. Besides, I’m not really sure you know exactly what argument you have with me. ;-)

"You have a very rigid mindset.
Maybe the tin foil hat is blocking it."

i think you are probably reacting a little defensively. I have been designing quantum mechanical products for years. Besides I’m allergic to tin.

"I sincerely wish you luck."

Back at ya!

geoff kait
machina dynamica
we do artificial atoms right

geoffkait,

You are really an ok guy and I would love to tell you what i'm doing that involves (you know what) but nah....

If I did tell you - you would actually agree with me and we would be on the same page.

I think I have said too much already.
I have too much legal stuff going on right now.
I hope you understand.


Roger

Roger wrote,

"geoffkait,

You are really an ok guy and I would love to tell you what i’m doing that involves (you know what) but nah....

If I did tell you - you would actually agree with me and we would be on the same page.

I think I have said too much already.
I have too much legal stuff going on right now.
I hope you understand."

Oh, I understand, all right. :-)

Looking on the positive side of all of this at least you didn’t say if you told me you’d have to kill me. Good luck with all the legal stuff. Wink wink

Your quantum bro',

Geoff Kait
machina dynamica
advanced audio conceits

Just a note about "things in the actual world," my stepson's Cambridge MA based company developed systems to pull conversations out of loud environments, and won an Emmy for it (it had been utilized in the "Most Dangerous Catch" series). Smart kids over there. Secret pseudo science claims for items producing audio nirvana waste everybody's time…talk to people who do the real work as they're much more interesting.

Wolfman, that’s rather interesting. And right on cue. That’s actually the field I worked in for quite some time. That was 36 years ago. Would you believe Hedy Lamarr (yes, the glamorous actress) was the inventor of spread spectrum communications? You know, WWII.