The speaker specs indicate bass range impedance down to 3.8 ohm. Not natural turf for a tube amp. The speaker specs are fairly detailed for a product manual but specs still leave grey areas. Plus the current operating condition is not clear. It is very hard to say without actually being able to hear what the op hears. I’d give the Luxman a shot for comparison if not done already. Perhaps the ARC amps just need a tune up. They look pretty beefy like they should be reasonably up to the task. Still 4 ohm and less in the bass region and most tube amps are not a natural match from a low distortion perspective.
Newbie needs help on Audio Research and DynAudio Quality
Hello all,
I am a newbie to high end home audio and need help from all of you audiophiles out there. I was actually into high end car audio back to when I was younger so I kinda understand what sound quality level can be considered at audiophile standard. I bought this set up (2 mono amps Audio Research Classic 120, Audio Research LS22 preamp, Dynaudio Contour 1.8 mkII, Rega Planet CD player) 4 years ago and did not have time and room to put them up to enjoy until recently. After setting them up last week, I was very disappointed at the performance. The sound was harsh and I would get tired after listening to 2-3 songs. I remember when I picked up the speakers, the previous owner played a couple of songs using his turntable and it was warm, clear and enjoyable (I could not remember what equipment he had back then). I have another set of solid state stuff to play around which includes Luxman M-12 amplifier, Sansui CA-2000 preamp, JBL 4311B, and same CD player Rega Planet. The sound quality is much better compared to ARC set. I expect that the ARC set at least has to be at entry level of audiophile but what I got out from it is disappointing. I need help from you experts to point out what is wrong or what I should expect from Audio Research.
Best Regards,
Dan
- ...
- 24 posts total
- 24 posts total