Personal speaker evolution

If you liked the older Walshes, you'll love the newer series 3 line. 100's cost under $2000 and sound much like Walsh 5 in the average room. Walsh 5 does more in larger rooms and has level adjustments, but these are not needed for most music in most rooms if you have flexibility in placement, room tuning, etc. (check out my review of the 100's I have posted here which apples to apples compares them to old Walsh 2's and newer Walsh 5's).

RADIO SHACK ???? THEY WERE 4" DEEP THEY SUCKED 1981
BOSE 301 1984 THEY GOT ME EVICTED
PARADIGM 9S ,STUDIO MONITERS ,PS1200 SUBS 1991 ,THEY STILL SOUND GOOD.
LEGACY FOCUS 2001 I LOVE THEM MY MAIN RIGS
CARVER PLATM AMAZINGS 2008 HEY THEY LOOK GREAT ANYWAY.
IN THE FUTURE MAYBE SOUND LABS OR THE LEGACY WHISPERS

In 74 I bought a pair of all-in-one (1)Utah 12" drivers and built plywood boxes for them. What can I say; I was a freshman in high school.
When I graduated I bought a demo pair of (2) Marantz Imperial 8's. My brother still has them.
Then I bought a pair of (3)Speakerlab 30's . . . still have them.
(4) Boston A70's with a JBL B380 sub. Still have
(5) Another pair of Speakerlab 30's. Still have
(6) Wharfedale W70D II's. Still have
(7) Nestorovic Type V's. Still have and love
(8) ADS L1590's with the PA1 amps. Still have
(Cont from 2002)
(9) Nestorovic System 12 (Best of the lot)
(10) RBH T2's
(11) Escalante Junipers w/RBH 1212 Sub

In order from 1975:
Advent large
Bose 901
added bose am5 (2 satellites and a sub)
Quad 57 ESL
Ohm 5 MKII
Apogee Stage
Quad 22L2 & 21L2
Apogee Caliper Sigantures

I feed the Apogees the cleanest signal I can afford and they are awesome. They quad ESL 57 have a great midrange and the Ohms are great at filling a room. I like the accuracy of the Apogee.

the best impression and the worst desillution, were the spirit by soundcraft absolute zero. with peavey cs200x

the ab-zero when brand new, sounded verry similar to genelec but non metallic, amazing, but when they broke-in 2 days later, were something else, i could never get used to.

but... depends on your ear/brain, what likes more, color or grey sound. "diferent harmonics"

urei 809 with lots of eq, sounds nice, but highs are not detailed enough. becouse the tweeter diaphragm its 1.75-inch

tannoy system 8nfn or 215ii, too much coloration, for my taste.

tannoy system 2 with crown d75, had an amazing out of the speaker sound = 3d mids, but same coloration as the others.

genelec 1030a nice, really nice.

jbl control 1 also nice highs with lots of EQ. weak low end.

behringer truth b2031a grey, not good, the black: nice.

jbl 4206 nice,

but the amp makes a big diference.

mcintosh c32/c33 with jbl 4343 had almost a perfect sound for me, exept the verry collapsing mids.

logitech x-540 , sounds amazing for the price, with just a litle eq.
but the room also makes a big diference.

the crossover also.
its fun to make experiments with passive two way speakers. and make them active with amps and active analog or digital crossovers.

yamaha ns-10/40 uhmm, with lots of eq are nice to my ears.

jbl eon 15g2 , with lots of eq, sounds nice. "the one with the first version of the amp, lm338" but... same 1.75" non detailed highs.

m-audio bx8a, sounds grey, but with lots of eq can sound colored.

krk rp5 sounds nice out of the box, but the rp8 dont like it.

emu.com rp5, uhmmm nice mids, but... highs are piercing but sounds overall too dark. similar to event 20/20 passsive.

alesis monitors, wrong mids, weak harmonics, for my taste.

jbl control 25, with eq sounds nice. a bit cheap, but complete, a bit compressed dynamic range.

i like more the trumpet mids & highs sound, vs. the direct sound, but krk rp5 mk1, are the exeption.

havent heard klipsh copper wooofer with tractrix horns,
but look pretty anyway.

etc..etc..etc..

personall evolution, ?
more like personal roller coaster