Reel to reel , is it real the hype!

@newtoncr blank tape may not be cheap, but high end R2R is not a budget hobby. If you have a production master of something like the Beatles' Revolver, it is something to be cherished and cared for. Every pass you make over the tape heads will degrade the tape by a very small amount. Production masters are pretty much irreplaceable. It's the tape version of an LP lacquer (albeit more robust).
If you copy your USD 500-1000 production master once onto new tape and also onto digital, you will have absolutely the best quality source for your music. Play the copy or digital file as much as you like - its won't matter if you shred the tape copy or corrupt the digital dupe. You will still have your original master to run another copy off carefully, before storing the master again.
USD 60-80 may not be cheap for a blank tape, but blank tape is relatively easily available. Production masters aren't.

@topoxforddoc agreed , I am making digital copies of the master and using the masters only for critical listening. 

@newtoncr, check out tapetape.com. He sells new tape one pass tape from studios. He normally has quite a selection. 
And need to remember the 60-80 bucks for a new blank tape is about the same as the 25 dollars for a new blank 40 years ago, if you figure in inflation and devaluation of the buck. If you have a lot of tapes, you may find that only a few get played a lot. the rest will get infrequent play. Besides the deck maint, one of the biggest issues with tape is the storage space required to hold them all. 

@johnss , thank you for the information.
I have been buying 1/2 “ 911 bias tapes that have been costing me about 137$ a tape and I need 2 tapes per album ie 274$ per album. 
the prices in this website are much more reasonable.
I will contact them .

United Home Audio, a big champion of reel-to-reel tape, makes tape copies of vinyl albums.  This is one way to preserve records (by not playing them much) and they maintain that the sound of the tape version of an album is actually better than the source album played on the record player.  I've heard the comparison at their shop, and it was interesting.  I still preferred the record (a touch more lively), but, I can see how someone might like the very smooth and open sound of the taped copy.  They also have many of those spectacular sounding $500 copies from master tapes.

A friend of mine who reconditions tape machines is a big fan of Otari machines.  He said they are easy to service and are built like tanks so they are quite durable.  The downside is that most were used by professionals, so they have been subjected to very heavy use.  Another friend bought something like ten machines from a folded books on tape operation.  He got all of the machines, plus other gear for a few hundred dollars and has been slowly selling off machines and parts.  

Not that long ago, I got to hear a big Studer that sounded really good.  It is one of those holy grail machines, along with the Ampex ATR 100 machines (I've never heard one) that the very serious tape fans seek out.  This looks like a fun hobby for those who are not as lazy as I am--I don't play my turntable that much because of the extra effort required over using a music server.