2. tech-talk
  3. 1251350312

Resampling my music collection

Suppose I wanted to do a static resampling of my music collection in the form of lossless audio files. Would there be an advantage to resampling to 96 kHz rather than 48 kHz? The only quibble I have with 96 kHz is that it would make the files twice the size.

One of the reasons I want to do a static resample is that if I want to do any DSP during playback, I don't have to worry about the resampling ability of the DSP software that I use.
128x128dnewhous
dnewhous's avatar
dnewhous OP
68 posts
 
Nevermind on SSRC. The "high precision" version was a plugin for foobar2000 that is no longer available.

Adobe Audition of all the commercial software comes closest to matching the performance of Pro Tools.
jtwrace's avatar
jtwrace
443 posts
 
Dnewhous

Wave Editor still looks really good to me...for $79
dnewhous's avatar
dnewhous OP
68 posts
 
In case you didn't notice, Wave Editor only works on Macs, and Adobe Audition costs less than a new computer.
jtwrace's avatar
jtwrace
443 posts
 
I use Mac for my computer audio so I'm all set there. At the $79 that Wave Editor costs, it MUCH less then Adobe Audition. Do you really think that A.A. would be better for me still?
onhwy61's avatar
onhwy61
5,196 posts
 
I don't see the point of your wanting to resample. How is resampling any different than any other DSP process you might apply?
More to discover