Review: Cardas Golden Reference Interconnect

Category: Cables

I have just completed comparing the Cardas Golden Reference interconnects with the Cardas Golden Cross interconnects from the cd player to the preamp. The Golden Cross interconnects have a warm, but detailed sound. The voices and the instruments all blend to make a nice overall presentation. On the other hand, the Golden Reference had incredible detail, but the sounds did not blend. It had a higher and overall separated sound. It seemed to be bright on my system for a Cardas cable. The midrange stood out more noticeably and just didn't seem to blend for an overall presentation. I do tend to like my music a little on the warm side, but detailed. I felt the Golden Cross was more appealing and much more balanced. I did several different comparisions using several different types of music, from jazz to rock over a week period. I bought the Golden Reference a few weeks ago and it seemed to change the sound in different ways than I expected. Therefore, I decided to compare the two interconnects before passing judgement. My overall opinion is as good as the Golden Reference is, for my system and tastes, I choose the Golden Cross.

Associated gear
YBA CD1 Blue Alpha CD player
Kora Eclipse Tube preamp
1960's Siemens Gold pin tubes
Monster Cable AVS2000 Voltage stabalizer
Pass Labs X250 amplifier
Martin Logan Assent Speakers
Cardas Golden Cross interconnects and speaker cable
Cardas Golden Reference power cords

Similar products
Wire World
Elipse III
Cardas Cross
Cardas Golden Cross
Kimber Select
Audioquest Anaconda
Cardas Natural Reference
My Goodness, Irish hound, can you expand a bit on why there is a differance and enlighten us on what is going on between the component/pre-amp and the pre to power amp? i think we are getting a bit esoteric here, but I am interested......
Since my post on this a year ago, I have seen a lot of system changes and have finally settled in on golden reference balanced ic's from CD to pre and from pre to amp. The sound is detailed, but rich and textured, and never harsh. The soundstage is large with very good imaging. I recently tried using golden cross between pre and amp, and found the sound too thick in the midbass and a little rolled off at the extremes compared to the golden reference, at least for my system. I doubt I will be changing any time soon. Anyone need 1.5M XLR golden cross ic's? - Tim
Redkiwi got it exactly right when he says "For me the Golden Reference ICs are faster, more immediate, more neutral, and have better pacing than the Golden Cross."

But the Golden Cross can be a better match for some systems than the Golden Ref. The Golden Cross has a sweetness and refinement that can work wonders with systems that are a bit dry sounding. Speakers with metalic tweeters or pure solid state systems are good candidates for CGC.

So if you are looking for a fast, clean detailed cable extended top and bottom that will perhaps add a hint of refinement to your system, go with Cardas Golden Ref.

If you need more refinement and sweetness than the CGR offers, then I'd go with the Cardas Golden Cross.

Both are wonderful in the right applications, IMO.
I've had a pair of Golden Cross between the CD (Linn Ikemi) player and the pre-amp (McIntosh C100) and we A/b compared with Analysis Plus Crystal Oval.... the Analysis Plus had all the warmth but allowed a lot more detail, too.

Listening to some Celtic violin/fiddle music you could really hear the rosin on the bow/strings interaction....with Golden Cross it was gone! Just too much affect on the music for my tastes! Prefer to actually hear what's there.