Zaikesman,
Actually in the case of my set up it is the Bryston that is clipping. The amp has clipping indicator lights to let you know when you are asking for too much. I’ve always turned the amp down when these turn on. When I have the system that loud I’m really looking for loud as opposed to serious listening.
As for the 1.6’s, I have never owned a pair myself. I’ve demo’ed them at several stores with different equipment and room setups. One time they sounded god awful thanks to the “infinite echo” room they were in. I’ve also heard them sound incredible. Infact I think they sounded better that a set of 3.6’s I listened to. Once again that could have a lot to do with the room they were in. I agree that the 1.6’s are an incredible deal and much better sounding (using the audiophile definition of “much”) than the MMG’s but…
Real life settles in: Used or even new 1.6’s are not too expensive but they are too big for me. I’m not sure they would work in my room smallish and I know all would not welcome 6’ speakers. This is the primary reason I have decided to stick with the MMG’s instead of 1.6’s. Even now I miss the unimposing size of my old Meadowlark Kestrels. As for my electronics, I do find it somewhat ironic that my speakers are the cheapest part of my system. I’ve been very curious how a low cost system, based on Rotel, NAD or Adcom would sound compared to my system. I think a used system could be put together for ~$1000 based on what I have seen on audiogon.
Thanks for the feedback
-Nikkidanjo
Actually in the case of my set up it is the Bryston that is clipping. The amp has clipping indicator lights to let you know when you are asking for too much. I’ve always turned the amp down when these turn on. When I have the system that loud I’m really looking for loud as opposed to serious listening.
As for the 1.6’s, I have never owned a pair myself. I’ve demo’ed them at several stores with different equipment and room setups. One time they sounded god awful thanks to the “infinite echo” room they were in. I’ve also heard them sound incredible. Infact I think they sounded better that a set of 3.6’s I listened to. Once again that could have a lot to do with the room they were in. I agree that the 1.6’s are an incredible deal and much better sounding (using the audiophile definition of “much”) than the MMG’s but…
Real life settles in: Used or even new 1.6’s are not too expensive but they are too big for me. I’m not sure they would work in my room smallish and I know all would not welcome 6’ speakers. This is the primary reason I have decided to stick with the MMG’s instead of 1.6’s. Even now I miss the unimposing size of my old Meadowlark Kestrels. As for my electronics, I do find it somewhat ironic that my speakers are the cheapest part of my system. I’ve been very curious how a low cost system, based on Rotel, NAD or Adcom would sound compared to my system. I think a used system could be put together for ~$1000 based on what I have seen on audiogon.
Thanks for the feedback
-Nikkidanjo