Scott Nixon Tubedac = WOW


I literally connected my new to me, second hand, broken in, Scott Nixon tubedac + about 1 hour ago and boy am I impressed. It's being used in place of my Benchmark DAC1 right now.

There is more heft and realism thru the SN. The DAC1 is very detailed as most people have reported, however, I have been using the DAC1 since before I assembled my current system and did not realize how detailed it was until I compared it to the SN. It's like not noticing something is there until it's not.

The SN is a very "easy" dac to listen to so far. The best way I can describe it is that it just goes with the flow.

If I were a recording engineer, the DAC1 would be my choice. If I just want to listen to music, the SN is the one I would choose.

Overall, the DAC1 is the better of the two, but the SN more than holds it's own. Of course, it's only been an hour since I installed it in the system.
gherrera1
Your post illustrates why the cost of a piece of equipment does not translate into listening pleasure for everyone. I was beginning to think that the DAC1 was sent from heaven with all the positive reviews, articles, posts, etc. But, I keep hearing the same words used, as you mentioned: detail, precision, accuracy. When I listen to vinyl I mostly listen for emotion, flow, natural voices and instruments. These are not exclusive of each other but are different flavors, like ice cream. Thanks for your post. I am interested to hear if others have compared the two and their reactions. For the money, the SN is hard to beat!
Hello fellow SN fans. You have experienced what owners of the Scott Nixon Tube DAC have been reporting for a long while. I have a friend that has tried almost every dac you can think of under $2,500. He ended up with a SN Tub DAC. He didn't stop there he has another tube dac on his 2nd systema and a Chibi Dac (solid state SN DAC) (spelling) in his 3rd room. I have tried personally several of the DAC's he has had in my system and I can confirm the SN tube dac has more body on the instruments and vocals.
Spatial resolution is great too. The SN Tube DAC does not alter the sound spectrum. I appears to stay neutral.
There are a few other DAC's I'd like to hear such as the Mew PS Audio Powerwave gear, and a couple others but all of them cost over $2500. So for under $600 you really get a great DAC in a Scott Nixon Tube DAC. I've been enjoying mine for well over 4 years while being used on an Oppo at first and now an Arcam DV78 which sounds remarkable. I like the fact that some of my bright CD's don't have that zippy top end with the SN DAC. Enjoy
Yes, the SN is very good indeed and I'm glad I purchased it.

I think my set up might have something to do with it as well. Focal Utopia Be speakers and Krell amplification. With the DAC1, the listener could get tired of the treble at times. A very resolving DAC and metal tweeters don't always play well. What I liked about DAC1 and Krell was that the amp has strong bass, a Krell characteristic, so it countered the leaness of the DAC1.

With the SN, the highs are smoother, not necessarily rolled off, but just smoother and less abrasive. And that's with some "high end" RCA cables from radio shack. I'm thinking of maybe replacing them with Nordost Red Dawn to match the rest of the loom, but it sounds great as is.

Also, after an extended listening session last night, the one thing I noticed was some slight low end bloat with certain material. Maybe a better IC and a different tube can alleviate some of that. Current tube is a JAN/Phillips mil version 6299.