Shindo preamp with Mcintosh MC252


Anyone out there with this combo? I'm in the market for a tube preamp and I was wondering if the entry level Shindo will be a good match for the MC252?

On that note, what are some of my options in the $2000 - $2500 range? Used is fine. I love a wide, holographic soundstage. Clarity and detail are important, but I prefer a bit warmth and liquidity over neutral sounding equipment to be honest. I prefer gear that's easy to listen to for a long time, with great pace and rythm, and a huge 3D soundstage.
nitewulf
Nitewulf,
Based on the qualities you seek I think you would be very happy with the Shindo Aurieges. If you find one used go for it, the used ones are sold pretty fast when available.Personally I`d prefer Shindo to the MAC preamp.
Good Luck,
Thanks for the responses guys,

TIs49, actually I am looking to try something else besides a McIntosh preamp.

Charles, thanks, my only worry is the high output impedance of the Shindo Aurieges, and I am wondering if it'll work well with the MC252.

I am also interested in Conrad Johnson and the Dehaviland Ultraverve, but I'm not sure if the modern CJs and the Dehaviland are more neutral and less tubey.
Nitewulf,

Definitely check out the impedance ratio between the Shindo and the Mac. Some Mac amps are as low as 10K, some preamps can be over 1K, not a great ratio.

I like CJ's newer preamps. I know the CT-5's output imp is spec'd at 800 and their ACT and ART's are 500. I have them and use them with my Pass ss, SET's and even a Class T amp, every pairing gives me great results.
If the Shindo pre you are eyeballing is good match to that amplifier, I'd say give it a shot for sure!

I grew up listening to my dads Mac gear and acquired a Shindo Aurieges-L for myself a couple of weeks ago and suspect the pairing could be something special based on sonic signatures.
Never heard the Shindo's, but I'm running a Lamm LL2 deluxe with my McIntosh MC275 and love it. It's priced used within your range. I think the Lamm beats the C220 in sound (I tried it with same amp and speakers), but the Mc interfase is a lot more friendly (remote, display, source level matching, etc). Can't argue with the sound quality, though!