Stylus-Drag..Fact or Fiction?

Raul raises a good point. How accurately are the various cutting lathes spinning? This is a whole different topic. 

It does lead nicely into long term average speed accuracy....
There is a trend to show how incredibly accurate peoples DD TTs run, posting videos using the timeline over extended runs. This is a great demonstration of how accurately a TT's long term speed control can be.

But how important is an average 33.3333333 rpm?
Lets say TT1 runs at an average 33.333 and TT2 runs at an average 33.334. A 1000hz tone cut accurately at 33.333 would of course be played back at 1000hz on TT1, but it would be higher on TT2 at 1000.03hz.
I don't claim to be able to hear this difference. 

What I think is important is the TTs dynamic speed accuracy. How does it behave under a varying load. I believe that we are sensitive to real time changes in pitch. But do not hear them as such. Halcro describes the Raven as being more relaxed than the Victor. This general description pretty much covers many BD/DD comparisons. Clearly we are hearing differences but not describing these in terms of pitch. We  use different descriptors.. 

The timeline only tells us how long it takes for the platter to make one rotation. Confirming, or not, that it took 1.8 seconds at its 33.33 setting. That is, was its average speed 33.33 or not.  It does not tell us anything about what happened to the platters dynamic speed during that rotation. 

Yeah, yeah, the platters inertia will save you, I don't think so. There are no free lunches.  


Chris.

Many thanks for the input of which I completely concur.


Lewm
I couldn't resist!  

Dear @richardkrebs  :  "   This is a whole different topic. ", yes diferent but with direct relationship with " audible "/or not speed deviations that we " charge  " to the TT culprit when maybe not always came from the speed unstability in the TT.

Perhaps we need a recording engineering to answer the question, that I remember in this moment Atmasphere has enough experience about and maybe he could chime here on it.

In the other side:  "  TTs dynamic speed accuracy. """ M.Lavigne posted about " steady " as the critical issue and yes this is the main subject with any TT.

In your example if both TTs are " steady " we can't be able to detect it and maybe we can't even if not steady because speed difference is so tiny.

R.

"But I was a bit puzzled by your statement: "A 24 pole motor turns at half the speed of 12 pole motor so the frequency of the cogs is identical in both (120Hz)." In a direct-drive turntable, doesn't the motor have to turn at 33.3333 rpm, regardless of the number of poles? And therefore might there not be a theoretical advantage to having double the number of poles?"

My statement was in response to the assertion that adding more poles reduces cogging (it doesn't).  Doubling the number of poles does not change the vibration signature because it will also cause the motor to turn at half the speed (assuming the same 60Hz drive signal).  Both a 12 pole and a 24 pole motor will produce vibration from cogging at 120Hz (10 revs/sec x 12 poles at 600 RPM  and 5 revs/sec x 24 poles at 300 RPM).  The amplitude of the vibrations is directly proportional to the power consumption of the motor, not the number of poles.  If you go to the link I provided, you will see that the measurements bore this out.

The motor on a direct drive table does turn at 33.333 RPM so the number of poles will determine the drive frequency needed in that case (RPM=Freq x 60/pole pairs or Freq=RPM x pole pairs/60).  If the motor uses steel pole pieces, it is subject to cogging and the frequency of vibration will be 0.555Hz x number of poles;  in most cases, this would be below 20 Hz so it will show up as rumble.  To run a DD motor from 60Hz would require 216 poles.


From what I've seen, most of the DD tables use a DC motor with servo control (feedback) to maintain proper speed.  This of course, comes with its own set of problems.

Audiophiles are strange.

It is obvious that adults can’t develop perfect pitch (see why), so most likely none of you can detect such a tiny difference in pitch/tone by ear in a blind test playing records on your turntable. Even professional and very well educated musicians does not have a perfect pitch. How to develop perfect pitch? Watch this. I found it very interesting.

If you could detect a difference in tone between 33.333 and 33.334 then you’re not a human, or you must be 1 of 10 000 people trained for a perfect pitch since you’re baby.

In other words: If your turntable spinning slightly faster or slower you can’t detect it anyway when it comes to such a tiny difference people describing here above.

C’mon: 33.333 or 33.334? Are you serious?

Only 1 out of 10 000 people might have a perfect pitch and the only reason for this is because they’re born in a family of musicians and they were trained in the first 4 years of their life. Just watch this video.


P.S. I am using top japanese DD turntables with two tonearms on each and all those DDs are stable as hell.

Stylus-Drag ? Even if the tracking force is 1-3g, how about 900g record weight we’re putting on top or the record each time we play it? "Stylus-Drag problem" does not exist for me. Happy listening.

chakster.

I said... "I don't claim to be able to hear this difference"

You seem to be agreeing with me?.