Tang Band 2145 in action

@ Mozartfan I am happy you find the best wide range with my help ,W8-2145  is the best , The key is bamboo fiber cone, Listen me carefully, the next step to realistic sound, you have to cut parasitic piece of stupid paper called whizzer cone, and add good supertweeter, i can image ---you say WAUUU 

So you are trying to boost hits with your links.  It's a money scam.
Now I get it.

Myth buster.
***wide bands roll off both ends, lacks vass slam and dull highs.***

Prejudiced falsehood, based on lack of real exp with these speakers, Only hear-say,
Well here ya go, Stevie Wonders 1973, Too High.

Everything below about 80 hertz is rolled off, and badly. It is hard to tell where the highs roll off. All I hear is shrillness in the mid and low treble. You’re striking out on disproving anything.That is worse than the previous video I listened to and commented on. If it makes you happy, great. Quit saying that is high fidelity, because it is not. If I were the manufacturer of these drivers, I would be looking to have a cease and desist order written for you. The only reason I can think of for the dismal sound is that they are not being fairly represented here.

Seas Magnesiums in them (Tyler Acoustics Super Tower) which exhibited the same coloration. Clearly representative of the driver.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes Tyler and Joseph Audio, both  employ the Magnesium midwoofers.

Coloration??
Did you read the link review I posted above.
3rd indepentent party, unbiased, down to earth review of the Seas Thors.
Sure SB Acoustics makes some beautiful speakers 
No doubt, Scan speak as well.
Troels Gravesen employs all 3 and others.
He only uses the best drivers.
Look I should recant at least part of what i said above.
But not all.
Xover types are doable, if you are willing to accept their inner weaknesses and faults.
If low sens  speakers define high fidelity in your music, great, , I guess its your free choice.
My purpose of this topic is to point out how superior high sens (=92db++) are for classical music, which are hidden many nuances low sens speakers miss out. 
Jazz music as well is much more enjoyable overa a  high sens WBer.
Transforms jazz into a  magical experience. 
.


Look if the Focals, KEF's, Vandersteens,  Wislon;'s were as special as you suggest, why do folks dump them on the used market all the time?
And why can't you guys get a  consensus on which are winners, and which are losers.

You guys have been promoting your own specail house sound speaker, where others are pumping their special flavor.
All low sens speakers have serious  inner flaws, that need very expensive, complex xovers to  attempt to correect these weaknesses
,
Quite a  few tech geeks have already exposed the blantant ugly flaws in xovers, these gadgets suck the life out the  musical  source..,,,and really can not fix the low sens handicap.

Thiels, too flawed, B&W's the worst.
Your camp can't decide on any 1 xover type that can compete with the 2 wide bands above. 

While us WBer cult, we  know what we have, and never even consider going back to the xover low sens speakers.
Been there done THAT.

For Rock, R&B , yeah box speakers will work just fine, No special nuances required.