Tang Band 2145 in action

So you are trying to boost hits with your links

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More like trying to acheive a balnace around here. 
The speaker board has been all, 100% about these low sensitivity *LOUD* speakers.
Time for a  change.
My posts will eventually become sources of info for others down the road who would like to understand more about these **out the ordinary* speakers.
They are indeed different.
The low sensitivity box camp will have nothing to do with WBers, and  we will remain faithful to what we know  gives us the high fidelity we've always been searching for.

Again I will point out my experiement some months back/Thors on 1 channel,
WBer on the other.
Seas = The Wet Blanket Speaker.
No thanks.

were the manufacturer of these drivers, I would be looking to have a cease and desist order written for you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Obvuiously you are biased agaisnt WBers to the point of PRE-judice
Or you need new computer speakers.
The sound in the YT upload is quite accurate as to how they will perform in your system.
I have no idea why you are posting such unfair criticisms.
Really,,,just chill out,...
Cease and desist,,law suits,  .
really, whats wrong, chill out, You don't like the sound in the video, just say so, but don't go on about law suits, and such..I mean really....

listening to the Tang band 2145 in the video,, I know why I chose the DavidLouis VX8 over it.
But I will say at $250, really nice speaker,  almost equal to the Davidlouis, highs a  bit higher.

Look why don't you guys PM each other , come up with a  top dawg xover type  which midrange will match, equal, or surpass the Davidlouis VX8's midrange...
, None of you will come to any agreement,. Everyone will have their own vote and so will never arrive at a   model that makes midrange so beautiful as a  high tech WBer.

Whereas the 2 WB's I mentioned, along with the more expensive models, AER, Voxativ, all 4 will carry midrange with a  high degree of fidelity and  purity, cohesiveness/seamless  imagery.

This is their inner strength.
The heart  and soul of our music is in the midrange. 

So- other than the shelved off bass, what else needs help?
There is an emphasis in the mid treble, which does make that range a bit hot to me, with excess sibilance.

the upper mids also seem pushed a bit; this may or may not be due to a 4.8khz. resonance in the woofers.

So- what’s the bottom line? This standard, basic version gives a real taste of vey high end sound at a true bargain price.

I am posting again what I posted several days ago. The quotes above are direct copy and paste from the review you posted. They are his words, not mine. I just agree.

Coloration??
Did you read the link review I posted above.
3rd indepentent party, unbiased, down to earth review of the Seas Thors.

So the answer is yes, I did read the independent 3rd party review, and he agreed with my assessment. Again, you just cherry-picked what agreed with what you are pushing. Not the actual conclusion of the reviewer.

The cease and desist comment was an over exaggeration to make a point. However, your videos are doing those companies no favors. If I owned the company, I wouldn’t want you speaking for my product at all. You have no clue what you are doing.