The Palladian-A step beyond


The new cartridge from Acoustical Systems may finally be the LOMC to fully realise the theoretical advantages of the genus.
And convince those long-suffering audiophiles to whom the 'modern' MC presentation has been anathema to 'live sound'....that the realism of vintage LOMCs like the SPUs and FR-7 series has finally been recaptured 👀
IMAGE 1 
IMAGE 2 
IMAGE 3 
IMAGE 4 
IMAGE 5 
IMAGE 6 
IMAGE 7 
128x128halcro

Bluewolf,

***This is a great place to start. The UNI-DIN approach is informatively explained on the AS website:

http://www.arche-headshell.de/uni-din-a-new-approach/

I do hope that we can all kiss and make up and move on and enjoy this wonderful hobby, and present our views, all the more credibly, without personal attacks. ***

This is one of the things I already addressed. Maybe you thought it was just an attack with no basis in reality? Did you read the post script?

It is claimed that one null (point of tangency) can not be calculated from the other. According to the rules of geometry this is only possible if the cartridge can be aligned two ways at the same time. In other words, it's not possible. If you have an alternate solution I'd be interested.

As previously noted I ordered a Palladian a few weeks back based on the experiences @halcro  and others posted. It was hand delivered by Norm from Rutherford Audio last night and I installed it this morning. Installation is very easy given the very visible cantilever and number of parallel surfaces, as well as the multiple screw threads. One caveat is that it is quite a "flat" cartridge body (i.e. shorter distance vertically from stylus to top of body) hence for those with the tonearm at its extreme low of travel you may need a spacer (I am virtually bottoming out my tonearm and cannot lower it any more). For initial listening azimuth was set at level, SRA with he body horizontal (maybe halcro you can advise on how best to measure SRA given this stylus profile). 1/73g and load at 200 ohms

With the caveat that this is based only on the first few hours this does appear to be something special. What strikes me most is the fine detail on supporting instruments, for example individual strings on a finger picked guitar, or the details in a background (well buried in the mix) bass line. Relative to the Air Tight PC1 it replaced (which I really liked) it is less romantic in the bass, I suspect actually more accurate but also that the bass will open up with more hours. But overall it's the extreme sense of natural detail enabling you to wander around in the mix that is the overriding characteristic to me. I'll report back in more detail once I've gotten more hours but so far I would strongly recommend checking this cartridge out
Folkfreak, Thank you for taking the time to post your very early observations.  Sadly, the cost is such that one cannot casually "check this cartridge out".  It's more an act of faith. After you put tens of hours on the Palladian you might then want to switch back to the PC1 for a bit.  Such experiments can be quite revealing.

@folkfreak, I found that there was a significant change in the Palladian's sound after the first 10 hours or so of playing, all very positive. I would not have been happy with that initial sound compared to my run-in Aiwon. If you see promise immediately, I wager that you are in for a very happy experience. I very much look forward to your follow-up.

@lewm , a pity we do not live close, otherwise I would invite you around for a listen and a cup of good Chinese tea. Cartridges are practically the most difficult things to audition.

All the best.
Thanks for the preliminary report folkfreak...
As bluewolf says.....rapid improvement is heard through the first 20 hours although straight out-of-the-box, this cartridge will impress 👀

As lewm rightly reminds us......buying an uber-expensive new cartridge is an act of faith.
Best to take the advice of someone you trust. I did.....
I hope that being inspired to take that risk by reading this Thread, has paid off.....🤔❓

Regards